ArticleChemosphere2022
The effects of biochar and redox conditions on soil Pb bioaccessibility to people and waterfowl.
Article in Chemosphere, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergistic modulation of antioxidant enzymes by citric acid and EDTA to enhance lead tolerance and phytoextraction efficiency in harmel.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Remediation options to reduce bioaccessible and bioavailable lead and arsenic at a smelter impacted site - consideration of treatment efficacy.Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) · 2024Article
- Improvements in the biochemical responses and Pb and Ni phytoremediation of lavender (Lavandula angustifolia L.) plants through Funneliformis mosseae inoculation.BMC plant biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biochar can reduce lead (Pb) bioavailability to plants in metal-contaminated soil, but the ability of biochar to reduce the bioavailability of soil Pb to people and wildlife remains unknown. In this study, 17 biochars were evaluated as in situ amendments for three soils with distinct sources of Pb contamination (smelter emissions, ceramics waste, mining waste), hydrology (upland, well-drained soil vs submerged wetland soil), and biological receptors (human vs waterfowl). Biochars were made from blends of 30% manure (poultry litter or dairy manure) and 70% lignocellulosic material (wheat straw or grand fir shavings) and pyrolyzed at 300, 500, 700, and 900 °C. Soils were amended with 2% biochar (w/w) and incubated for 6 months. A suite of standard (e.g., EPA Method 1340) and experimental soil Pb bioaccessibility assays were used to assess the impact of the treatments. The results showed that biochar amendments to upland soils resulted in modest reductions in gastrointestinal Pb bioaccessibility (maximum reduction from 78 to 68% bioaccessibility as a percent of total, EPA Method 1340 at pH 2.5). In the wetland soil, sample redox status had a greater impact on Pb bioaccessibility than any amendment. Low-solubility Pb sulfides in this soil oxidized over the course of the study and no treatment was able to offset the increase in Pb bioaccessibility caused by this oxidation. The impact of redox status on Pb bioaccessibility was only evident when soil bioaccessibility assays were adapted to preserve sample redox status. This result highlights the importance of maintaining in situ redox conditions when processing/analyzing samples from low-oxygen environments and that soil remediation efforts should consider the role of redox conditions on Pb bioaccessibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.