Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35066060›Full record

Trial reportPhysiology & behavior2022

Exercise increases attentional bias towards food cues in individuals classified as overweight to obese.

Kyle D Flack, Robert E Anderson, Kylie F McFee, Richard Kryscio, Craig R Rush

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Physiology & behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kyle D FlackDepartment of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, College of Agriculture, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY United States. Electronic address: kyle.flack@uky.edu.
Robert E AndersonDepartment of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, College of Agriculture, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY United States.
Kylie F McFeeDepartment of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, College of Agriculture, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY United States. Electronic address: Kyle.Flack@uky.edu.
Richard KryscioDepartment of Statistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY United States.
Craig R RushDepartment of Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY United States; Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY United States; Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY United States.
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

Pilot Projects ProgramP30GM127211 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI PEARSON, KEVIN JOSEPH · 2018 to 2022
$5.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM127211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe obesity epidemic continues to be a major public health concern. Although exercise is the most common weight loss recommendation, weight loss outcomes from an exercise program are often suboptimal. The human body compensates for a large percentage of the energy expended through exercise to maintain energy homeostasis and body weight. Increases in energy intake appear to be the most impactful compensatory behavior. Research on the mechanisms driving this behavior has not been fully elucidated. PURPOSE: To determine if exercise influences the attentional processing towards food cues (attentional bias) and inhibitory control for food cues among individuals classified as overweight to obese who do not exercise.

methodsThirty adults classified as overweight to obese participated in a counterbalanced, crossover trial featuring two assessment visits on separate days separated by at least one week. Attentional bias and inhibitory control towards food cues was assessed prior to and after a bout of exercise where participants expended 500 kcal (one assessment visit) and before and after a 60 min bout of watching television (second assessment visit). Attentional bias was conceptualized as the percentage of time fixated on food cues when both food and neutral (non-food) cues were presented during a food-specific dot-probe task. Inhibitory control, specifically motor impulsivity, was assessed as percentage of inhibitory failures during a food-specific Go/NoGo task.

resultsA significant condition by time effect was observed for attentional bias towards food cues, independent of hunger, whereas attentional bias towards food cues was increased pre-post exercise but not after watching TV. Inhibitory control was not affected by exercise or related to attentional bias for food cues.

conclusionsAn acute bout of exercise increased attentional bias for food cues, pointing to a mechanism that may contribute to the weight loss resistance observed with exercise. Future trials are needed to evaluate attentional bias towards food cues over a longitudinal exercise intervention.

Indexed as

Attentional BiasOverweightAdultCross-Over StudiesCuesFeeding BehaviorFoodHumansObesityWeight LossAttentional biasExerciseFood cuesInhibitory controlObesityWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID35066060
PMCPMC8845497
OpenAlexW4205807964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.