Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35065607›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2022

Third generation cephalosporin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae thriving in patients and in wastewater: what do they have in common?

Jaqueline Rocha, Catarina Ferreira, Dalila Mil-Homens, Antonio Busquets, Arsénio M Fialho, Isabel Henriques, Margarita Gomila, Célia M Manaia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Antibacterial Activity ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Genetic Characterization of Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Pathogens and global health
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jaqueline RochaUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, CBQF - Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina - Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Rua Diogo Botelho 1327, 4169-005, Porto, Portugal.
Catarina FerreiraUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, CBQF - Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina - Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Rua Diogo Botelho 1327, 4169-005, Porto, Portugal.
Dalila Mil-HomensiBB-Institute of Bioengineering and Biosciences and i4HB-Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal.
Antonio BusquetsMicrobiologia, Departament de Biologia, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Arsénio M FialhoiBB-Institute of Bioengineering and Biosciences and i4HB-Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal.
Isabel HenriquesUniversity of Coimbra, Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Coimbra, Portugal.
Margarita GomilaMicrobiologia, Departament de Biologia, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Célia M ManaiaUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, CBQF - Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina - Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Rua Diogo Botelho 1327, 4169-005, Porto, Portugal. cmanaia@ucp.pt.
Universidade Católica Portuguesa · PTInstituto Superior TécnicoUniversitat de les Illes Balears · ESUniversity of Aveiro · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKlebsiella pneumoniae are ubiquitous bacteria and recognized multidrug-resistant opportunistic pathogens that can be released into the environment, mainly through sewage, where they can survive even after wastewater treatment. A major question is if once released into wastewater, the selection of lineages missing clinically-relevant traits may occur. Wastewater (n = 25) and clinical (n = 34) 3

resultsClinical and wastewater isolates were indistinguishable based on phenotypic and genotypic characterization. The analysis of whole genome sequences of 22 isolates showed that antibiotic and metal resistance or virulence genes, were associated with mobile genetic elements, mostly transposons, insertion sequences or integrative and conjugative elements. These features were variable among isolates, according to the respective genetic lineage rather than the origin.

conclusionsIt is suggested that once acquired, clinically relevant features of K. pneumoniae may be preserved in wastewater, even after treatment. This evidence highlights the high capacity of K. pneumoniae for spreading through wastewater, enhancing the risks of transmission back to humans.

Indexed as

Klebsiella InfectionsKlebsiella pneumoniaeAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCephalosporinsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsWastewaterAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCephalosporinsWastewaterAntibiotic resistanceClinicalComparative genomicsKlebsiella pneumoniaeWastewater

Identifiers

PMID35065607
PMCPMC8783465
OpenAlexW4207037725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.