Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35065265›Full record

ArticleClinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases2022

Prospective evaluation of the point-of-care use of a rapid antigenic SARS-CoV-2 immunochromatographic test in a paediatric emergency department.

Quentin Ollier, Sylvie Pillet, Olivier Mory, Julie Gagnaire, Charlotte Thuiller, Nadine Annino, Amandine Gagneux-Brunon, Elisabeth Botelho-Nevers, Thomas Bourlet, Bruno Pozzetto and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. The Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Antigen Testing (January 2023).Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Quentin OllierPediatric Emergency Department, University-Hospital of Saint Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Sylvie PilletDepartment of Infectious Agents and Hygiene, University-Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France; Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Team GIMAP, Université Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon, Lyon, France.
Olivier MoryPediatric Emergency Department, University-Hospital of Saint Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Julie GagnaireCentre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Team GIMAP, Université Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon, Lyon, France; Department of Infectious Diseases, University-Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Charlotte ThuillerPediatric Emergency Department, University-Hospital of Saint Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Nadine AnninoPediatric Emergency Department, University-Hospital of Saint Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Amandine Gagneux-BrunonCentre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Team GIMAP, Université Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon, Lyon, France; Department of Infectious Diseases, University-Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Elisabeth Botelho-NeversCentre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Team GIMAP, Université Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon, Lyon, France; Department of Infectious Diseases, University-Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Thomas BourletDepartment of Infectious Agents and Hygiene, University-Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France; Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Team GIMAP, Université Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon, Lyon, France.
Bruno PozzettoDepartment of Infectious Agents and Hygiene, University-Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France; Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Team GIMAP, Université Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon, Lyon, France.
Aymeric CantaisPediatric Emergency Department, University-Hospital of Saint Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France; Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Team GIMAP, Université Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon, Lyon, France. Electronic address: aymeric.cantais@chu-st-etienne.fr.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre International de Recherche en Infectiologie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the immunochromatographic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) speed antigen test (BioSpeedia, France) as an antigen point-of-care test (AgPOCT) to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection at the paediatric emergency department of the University Hospital of Saint-Etienne in France.

methodsBetween 15 January and 28 May, 2021, children presenting with respiratory symptoms compatible with COVID-19 infection (symptomatic group) or those requiring hospitalization for any reason (asymptomatic group) were included prospectively and received a nasopharyngeal aspiration to carry out both AgPOCT and quantitative reverse transcription (RT) PCR (RT-qPCR) tests, with the latter being used as the reference standard, for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

resultsAmong the 1009 enrolled children, we obtained a result from both techniques for 990: 33 (3.3%) tested positive with AgPOCT and 46 (4.6%) with RT-qPCR. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the AgPOCT were 69.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), 54.3-82.3) and 99.9% (95% CI, 99.4-100), respectively, compared with the RT-qPCR. Sensitivity increased to 82.9% (95% CI, 66.4-93.4) in symptomatic children. The mean cycle threshold value was significantly lower in positive samples for AgPOCT than in negative samples in the overall population and in both the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups. DISCUSSION: The use of the COVID-19 speed antigen test at the bedside in the emergency department has satisfactory performance for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection in symptomatic children.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2ChildCOVID-19 TestingEmergency Service, HospitalHumansPoint-of-Care SystemsSensitivity and SpecificityCOVID-19Diagnosis testPaediatricPOCTSensitivity

Identifiers

PMID35065265
PMCPMC8769904
OpenAlexW4206202542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.