Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35065173›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2022

Evaluating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer screening in a central Canadian province.

Kathleen M Decker, Allison Feely, Oliver Bucher, Harminder Singh, Donna Turner, Pascal Lambert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Impact of Canadian Medical Delays and Preventive Measures on Breast Cancer Experience: A Silent Battle Masked by the COVID-19 Pandemic.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kathleen M DeckerCancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, CancerCare Manitoba, 675 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 750 Bannatyne Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada; Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, CancerCare Manitoba, 675 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada. Electronic address: kdecker@cancercare.mb.ca.
Allison FeelyDepartment of Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, CancerCare Manitoba, 675 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada.
Oliver BucherDepartment of Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, CancerCare Manitoba, 675 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada.
Harminder SinghCancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, CancerCare Manitoba, 675 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 750 Bannatyne Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada; Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, University of Manitoba, 820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, MB R3A 1R9, Canada.
Donna TurnerDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 750 Bannatyne Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada; Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, CancerCare Manitoba, 675 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada.
Pascal LambertCancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, CancerCare Manitoba, 675 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada; Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, CancerCare Manitoba, 675 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on cancer screening in Manitoba, Canada using an interrupted time series (ITS) design and data from Manitoba's population-based, organized cancer screening programs from April 2020 to August 2021. In June 2020 (breast screening was suspended during April and May 2020), there was a 54% decrease between the predicted (i.e., observed data produced from regression models) and expected (i.e., counterfactual values produced for the COVID-19 period by assuming COVID-19 did not occur) number of screening mammograms (ratio = 0.46, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.28-0.64). By December 2020, there was no significant difference between predicted and expected number of screening mammograms (ratio = 0.95, 95% CI 0.80-1.10). In April 2020, there was an 83% decrease in the number of Pap tests (ratio = 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.30). By January 2021, there was no significant difference between predicted and expected number of Pap tests (ratio = 0.93, 95% CI 0.81-1.06). In April 2020, there was an 81% decrease in the number of screening program fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) (ratio = 0.19, 95% CI 0.0-0.44). By September 2020, there was no significant difference between predicted and expected number of FOBTs (ratio = 0.95, 95% CI 0.65-1.24). The estimated cumulative deficit (i.e., backlog) from April 2020 to August 2021 was 17,370 screening mammograms, 22,086 Pap tests, and 5253 screening program FOBTs. Overall, screening programs adapted quickly to the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional strategies may be needed to address remaining backlogs.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsCanadaEarly Detection of CancerHumansMass ScreeningPandemicsSARS-CoV-2CanadaCancerCOVID-19Epidemiologic studiesScreening

Identifiers

PMID35065173
PMCPMC8769532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.