Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35064891›Full record

ArticlePsychometrika2022

Two Filtering Methods of Forecasting Linear and Nonlinear Dynamics of Intensive Longitudinal Data.

Michael D Hunter, Haya Fatimah, Marina A Bornovalova

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychometrika, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Modeling the dynamics of addiction relapse via the double-well potential system.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael D HunterDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University, 119 Health and Human Development Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3651-6709
Haya FatimahDepartment of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA.
Marina A BornovalovaDepartment of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA.

Funding

Randomized Trial of Distress Tolerance Treatment for Substance UsersR01DA032582 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI BORNOVALOVA, MARINA ALEXA · 2012 to 2017
$3.1M
NIDA NIH HHS DA032582NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of new data collection technologies, intensive longitudinal data (ILD) are collected more frequently than ever. Along with the increased prevalence of ILD, more methods are being developed to analyze these data. However, relatively few methods have yet been applied for making long- or even short-term predictions from ILD in behavioral settings. Applications of forecasting methods to behavioral ILD are still scant. We first establish a general framework for modeling ILD and then extend that frame to two previously existing forecasting methods: these methods are Kalman prediction and ensemble prediction. After implementing Kalman and ensemble forecasts in free and open-source software, we apply these methods to daily drug and alcohol use data. In doing so, we create a simple, but nonlinear dynamical system model of daily drug and alcohol use and illustrate important differences between the forecasting methods. We further compare the Kalman and ensemble forecasting methods to several simpler forecasts of daily drug and alcohol use. Ensemble forecasts may be more appropriate than Kalman forecasts for nonlinear dynamical systems models, but further forecasting evaluation methods must be put into practice.

Indexed as

Nonlinear DynamicsForecastingPsychometricsdrug and alcohol usedynamical systemsforecastingintensive longitudinal dataKalman filteringtime series

Identifiers

PMID35064891
PMCPMC9177592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.