Observational studyOral and maxillofacial surgery2023
Assessment of clinical and ultrasonographic parameters as indicators for buccal fat pad excision by esthetic reasons.
Observational study in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound of the Cheek: Examination Technique, Anatomy, and Abnormal Findings.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026Review
- Volume Redistribution of the Buccal Fat Pad After Reduction Malarplasty.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe selection of candidates for buccal fat pad (BFP) removal depends on the patient's requirements, the subjective surgeons' evaluation, and objective clinical factors. This cross-sectional observational study aimed to identify objective clinical and ultrasonographic parameters as indicators of cheek contouring with BFP excision.
methodsSixty-six patients with cheek fullness complaints were examined by two experienced surgeons to determine if they were good candidates for the procedure. Thereafter, participants underwent clinical and ultrasonographic assessments in a separate session to aid in the surgical decision-making. The association between the clinical judgment for BFP excision and the study variables was analyzed individually and adjusted for confounders using binary logistic regression and grouping analyses.
resultsForty-nine participants were regarded as suitable and 17 as non-suitable for the procedure. After regression analysis, cheek skin-fold thickness > 6.00 mm, midfacial contour > 2.20 mm, ovoid/triangular facial form, and ultrasonographic BFP volume > 2.05 mL remained as robust individual indicators for the suitability for the procedure. However, the grouping analysis showed that patients having three-to-four significant criteria synchronously had significantly higher odds for eligibility with excellent discrimination capability.
conclusionAlthough high values of cheek skin-fold thickness, midfacial contour, and ultrasonographic BFP volume, as well as an ovoid/triangular facial form, might be robust indicators for the suitability for BFP excision, the surgical decision-making should not be based on isolated parameters. Instead, those patients possessing a combination of at least three of these specific eligibility criteria above the threshold value might be considered the best candidates for the procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35064843What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.