ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2022
Automatic quantitative evaluation of normal pancreas based on deep learning in a Chinese adult population.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a deep learning model for detecting and measuring gallstones on computed tomography images.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Deep-Learning-based Automatic Segmentation and Quantitative Measurement of Normal Spleen in Chinese AdultsCurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
- Characterization of adrenal glands on computed tomography with a 3D V-Net-based model.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence models assisting physicians in quantifying pancreatic necrosis in acute pancreatitis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Deep neural network-based segmentation of normal and abnormal pancreas on abdominal CT: evaluation of global and local accuracies.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- Age-related morphometrics of normal adrenal glands based on deep learning-aided segmentation.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Biomarkers of aging.Science China. Life sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a 3D U-Net-based model for the automatic segmentation of the pancreas using the diameters, volume, and density of normal pancreases among Chinese adults.
methodsA total of 2778 pancreas images (dataset 1) were retrospectively collected and randomly divided into training (n = 2252), validation (n = 245), and test (n = 281) datasets. The segmentation model for the pancreas was constructed through cascaded application of two 3D U-Net networks. The segmentation efficiency for the pancreas was evaluated by the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Another dataset of 3189 normal pancreas CT images (dataset 2) was obtained for external validation, including 1063 non-contrast images, 1063 arterial phase images, and 1063 portal venous phase images. The pancreas segmentation in dataset 2 was assessed objectively and manually revised by two radiologists. Then, the pancreatic volume, diameters, and average CT value for each phase of pancreas images in dataset 2 were calculated. The relationships between pancreas volume and age, sex, height, and weight were analyzed.
resultsIn dataset 1, a mean DSC of 0.94 for the test dataset was achieved. In dataset 2, the objective assessment yielded a 90% satisfaction rate for the automatic segmentation of the pancreas as external validation. The diameters of the pancreas were 43.71-44.28 mm, 67.40-68.15 mm, and 114.53-117.06 mm, respectively. The average pancreatic volume was 63,969.06-65,247.75 mm
conclusionThe pancreas segmentation tool based on deep learning can segment the pancreas on CT images and measure its normal diameter, volume, and CT value accurately and effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.