Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35064612›Full record

SynthesisEcology letters2022

Sex-specific inbreeding depression: A meta-analysis.

Regina Vega-Trejo, Raïssa A de Boer, John L Fitzpatrick, Alexander Kotrschal

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Ecology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Demographic drivers of reproductive failure in a threatened bird: Insights from a decade of data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Regina Vega-TrejoDepartment of Zoology: Ethology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4349-8163
Raïssa A de BoerDepartment of Zoology: Ethology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6064-6562
John L FitzpatrickDepartment of Zoology: Ethology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2834-4409
Alexander KotrschalDepartment of Zoology: Ethology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3473-1402

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/V001256/1Carl Tryggers Foundation 152Carl Tryggers Foundation 17Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation 2016-0146Vetenskapsrådet 2017-04680Vetenskapsrådet 2017-04957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inbreeding depression, the reduced fitness of the offspring of related individuals, can affect males and females differently. Although a comprehensive theoretical framework describing the causes of sex-specific inbreeding depression is lacking, empirical evidence suggests that often one sex tends to be more vulnerable than the other. However, the generality, direction, and degree of sex-specific difference in inbreeding depression remains enigmatic as studies on this topic have reported conflicting results. Here, we conduct a meta-analysis to test for sex-specific differences in the magnitude of inbreeding depression. We synthetised 321 effect sizes of experimental studies across 47 species and found a small difference in inbreeding depression between the sexes: females suffered slightly higher inbreeding depression than males. Furthermore, a higher inbreeding coefficient was correlated with higher inbreeding depression. However, there was a large amount of heterogeneity that remained unexplained, even when considering different factors that could affect inbreeding between the sexes, such as sexual size dimorphism, heterogamety, the type of trait measured and whether animals were tested in a stressful environment. As such, we highlight the need to further explore inbreeding depression across different species to determine the occurrence and causes of sex differences to increase our understanding of the evolutionary consequences of sex-specific inbreeding depression.

Indexed as

Inbreeding DepressionAnimalsFemaleInbreedingMaleReproductionSex CharacteristicsSexual Behavior, Animalheterogamoushomozygosityincestsexual conflictsexual selection

Identifiers

PMID35064612
PMCPMC9304238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.