Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35064591›Full record

ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2022

Ageing well with diabetes: A workshop to co-design research recommendations for improving the diabetes care of older people.

Thomas A F Wylie, Anna Morris, Elizabeth Robertson, Ann Middleton, Carolyn Newbert, Birthe Andersen, Giuseppe Maltese, Rachel Stocker, Andrew Weightman, Alan Sinclair and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas A F WylieDiabetes UK, London, UK.
Anna MorrisDiabetes UK, London, UK.
Elizabeth RobertsonDiabetes UK, London, UK.
Ann MiddletonDiabetes Research Steering Group, London, UK.
Carolyn NewbertDiabetes Research Steering Group, London, UK.
Birthe AndersenYour Healthcare, Falls Prevention Service, Surbiton, UK.
Giuseppe MalteseEpsom and St Helier University Hospitals, and King's College, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6770-3569
Rachel StockerPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8189-2746
Andrew WeightmanDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Alan SinclairFoundation for Diabetes Research in Older People (fDROP) and King's College, London, UK.
Stephen C BainDiabetes Research Unit, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8519-4964
Diabetes UK · GBKing's College London · GBNewcastle University · GBSwansea University · GBUniversity of Kentucky HealthCare · USUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo identify key research questions where answers could improve care for older people living with diabetes (PLWD), and provide detailed recommendations for researchers and research funders on how best to address them.

methodsA series of online research workshops were conducted, bringing together a range of PLWD and an acknowledged group of academic and clinical experts in their diabetes care to identify areas for future research. Throughout the pre-workshop phase, during each workshop, and in manuscript preparation and editing, PLWD played an active and dynamic role in discussions as part of both an iterative and narrative process.

resultsThe following key questions in this field were identified, and research recommendations for each were developed: How can we improve our understanding of the characteristics of older people living with diabetes (PLWD) and their outcomes, and can this deliver better person-centred care? How are services to care for older PLWD currently delivered, both for their diabetes and other conditions? How can we optimise and streamline the process and ensure everyone gets the best care, tailored to their individual needs? What tools might be used to evaluate the level of understanding of diabetes in the older population amongst non-specialist Healthcare Professionals (HCPs)? How can virtual experts or centres most effectively provide access to specialist multi-disciplinary team (MDT) expertise for older PLWD and the HCPs caring for them? Is a combination of exercise and a nutrition-dense, high protein diet effective in the prevention of the adverse effects of type 2 diabetes and deterioration in frailty, and how might this be delivered in a way which is acceptable to people with type 2 diabetes? How might we best use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in older people and, for those who require support, how should the data be shared? How can older PLWD be better empowered to manage their diabetes in their own home, particularly when living with additional long-term conditions? What are the benefits of models of peer support for older PLWD, both when living independently and when in care?

conclusionsThis paper outlines recommendations supported by PLWD through which new research could improve their diabetes care and calls on the research community and funders to address them in future research programmes and strategies.

Indexed as

DementiaDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Healthy AgingAgedBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringHumansBlood Glucosediabetes; ageingPLWDresearch

Identifiers

PMID35064591
PMCPMC9303664
OpenAlexW4206938217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.