Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35064578›Full record

ArticleAnaesthesia2022

Recruitment to higher specialty training in anaesthesia in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national survey.

J Subramaniam, F Durrant, S Edwardson, S El-Ghazali, C Holt, R McCrossan, I Pramanik, D J N Wong

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Anaesthesia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Once a doctor, always a doctor.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J SubramaniamDepartment of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6250-3736
F DurrantDepartment of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
S EdwardsonDepartments of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
S El-GhazaliDepartment of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
C HoltDepartment of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
R McCrossanDepartment of Anaesthesia, James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.
I PramanikDepartment of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
D J N WongDepartment of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBJames Cook University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There were more applications for higher specialty training posts in anaesthesia in the UK starting in August 2021 than in previous years, with approximately two-thirds being unsuccessful. We surveyed applicants to investigate their experience of the recruitment process (response rate 536/1056; 51%). Approximately 61% of respondents were not offered ST3 posts (n = 326). We enquired about their career plans for the next 12-24 months. Most respondents (79%) intended to take up a post equivalent to a third year of core training or a clinical fellow post from August 2021. Other options considered included: pursuing work abroad (17%); embarking on career breaks (16%); taking up higher training posts in intensive care medicine (15%); and permanently leaving medicine (9%). Nine per cent of respondents also expressed plans to pursue training in another medical specialty. Some expressed an intention to pursue further education or research (10%). A large proportion (42%) expressed a lack of confidence in being able to achieve the training requirements to later apply for a higher training post. The majority reported not feeling confident in achieving specialist registration in anaesthesia in the future without a training number (75%), and noted disruption to their wider life plans from the impending time out of training (78%). Sentiment analysis of free-text responses indicated generally negative sentiment about the recruitment process. Themes elicited included: feeling the recruitment process was unfair; burnout and negative impact on well-being; difficulties in making life plans; and feeling undervalued and abandoned. These results suggest that junior anaesthetic doctors in the UK negatively perceived postgraduate training structures and changes to the postgraduate curriculum and experienced difficulties in securing higher training.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaAnesthesiologyCOVID-19Attitude of Health PersonnelCareer ChoiceHumansPandemicsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomrecruitmentspeciality trainingwell-being

Identifiers

PMID35064578
OpenAlexW4207055680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.