ArticleCardiovascular engineering and technology2022
Experimental and Mouse-Specific Computational Models of the Fbln4
Article in Cardiovascular engineering and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- HeartSimSage: Attention-Enhanced Graph Neural Networks for Accelerating Cardiac Mechanics Modeling.Journal of computational physics · 2026Article
- Patient-Specific Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulations Suggest Wall-Shear-Stress-Related Biomarkers in Type B Dissection Associated with Marfan Syndrome.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Effects of Left Atrial Wall Thickness on Myocardial Mechanics and Blood Dynamics using Multiscale Modeling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Alterations in ascending aortic hemodynamics and aortic length correlate with sex-specific thoracic aortic aneurysm dilation and lifespan in a mouse model of severe Marfan syndrome.Computers in biology and medicine · 2026Article
- Fascicular Elastin Impacts Tendon-Specific Ramp-to-Failure and Fatigue Mechanics.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2025Article
- Different physiologic biomechanical metrics correlate with aortic diameter increases in normal maturation compared to aneurysm progression in mice.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2025Article
- Ascending aortic aneurysm growth in the Fbln4Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025Article
- Inverse finite element identification of murine aortic material properties:Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- A Technique to Track Scatterers for Continuous High-speed Plane-wave Ultrasound Simulations based on a Fluid Domain Model.IEEE open journal of ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025Article
- Animal Models, Pathogenesis, and Potential Treatment of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Statistical shape representation of the thoracic aorta: accounting for major branches of the aortic arch.Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo use computational methods to explore geometric, mechanical, and fluidic biomarkers that could correlate with mouse lifespan in the Fbln4
methodsImage-based, mouse-specific fluid-structure-interaction models were developed for Fbln4
resultsComparing the different geometrical and biofluidic biomarkers to the mouse lifespan, it was found that mean oscillatory shear index (OSI
conclusionThe results highlight potential biomarkers of ATAA outcomes that can be obtained through noninvasive imaging and computational simulations, and they illustrate the potential synergy between small-animal and computational models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.