ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2022
Selective visual attention during public speaking in an immersive context.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Designing and evaluating LLM-driven coaching agents for VR public speaking practice.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
It has recently become feasible to study selective visual attention to social cues in increasingly ecologically valid ways. In this secondary analysis, we examined gaze behavior in response to the actions of others in a social context. Participants (N = 84) were asked to give a 5-minute speech to a five-member audience that had been filmed in 360° video, displayed in a virtual reality headset containing a built-in eye tracker. Audience members were coached to make movements that would indicate interest or lack of interest (e.g., nodding vs. looking away). The goal of this paper was to analyze whether these actions influenced the speaker's gaze. We found that participants showed reliable evidence of gaze towards audience member actions in general, and towards audience member actions involving their phone specifically (compared with other actions like looking away or leaning back). However, there were no differences in gaze towards actions reflecting interest (like nodding) compared with actions reflecting lack of interest (like looking away). Participants were more likely to look away from audience member actions as well, but there were no specific actions that elicited looking away more or less. Taken together, these findings suggest that the actions of audience members are broadly influential in motivating gaze behaviors in a realistic, contextually embedded (public speaking) setting. Further research is needed to examine the ways in which these findings can be elucidated in more controlled laboratory environments as well as in the real world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.