Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35064505›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

The impact of carbon pricing, climate financing, and financial literacy on COVID-19 cases: go-for-green healthcare policies.

Haroon Ur Rashid Khan, Bushra Usman, Khalid Zaman, Abdelmohsen A Nassani, Mohamed Haffar, Gulnaz Muneer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
20.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Haroon Ur Rashid KhanFaculty of Business, University of Wollongong in Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Bushra UsmanSchool of Management, Forman Christian College (A Chartered University), Lahore, Pakistan.
Khalid ZamanDepartment of Economics, The University of Haripur, Haripur, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. khalid_zaman786@yahoo.com.
Abdelmohsen A NassaniDepartment of Management, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, P.O. Box 71115, Riyadh, 11587, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed HaffarDepartment of Management, Birmingham Business School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Gulnaz MuneerInstitute of Management Sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
Bahauddin Zakariya University · PKForman Christian College · PKKing Saud University · SAUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Haripur · PKUniversity of Wollongong in Dubai · AE

Funding

King Saud University RSP-2022/87
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate finance and carbon pricing are regarded as sustainable policy mechanisms for mitigating negative environmental externalities via the development of green financing projects and the imposition of taxes on carbon pollution generation. Financial literacy indicates that it is beneficial to invest in cleaner technology to advance the environmental sustainability goal. The current wave of the COVID-19 epidemic has had a detrimental effect on the world economies' health and income. The pandemic crisis dwarfs previous global financial crises in terms of scope and severity, collapsing global financial markets. The study's primary contribution is constructing a climate funding index (CFI) based on four critical factors: inbound foreign direct investment, renewable energy usage, research and development spending, and carbon damages. In a cross-sectional panel of 43 nations, the research evaluates the effect of climate funding, financial literacy, and carbon pricing in lowering exposure to coronavirus cases. The study utilized Newton-Raphson and Marquardt steps to estimate the current parameter estimates while evaluating the COVID-19 prediction model with level regressors using the robust least squares regression model (S-estimator). Additionally, the innovation accounting matrix predicts estimations over a specific period. The findings indicate that climate finance significantly reduces coronavirus exposure by introducing green financing initiatives that benefit human health, which eventually strengthens the immune system's ability to fight infectious illnesses. Financial literacy and carbon pricing, on the other hand, are ineffectual in controlling coronavirus infections due to rising economic activity and densely inhabited areas that enable the transmission of coronavirus cases across countries. Similar findings were obtained using the alternative regression apparatus. The COVID-19 predicted variable was used as a "response variable," and climate financing was shown to have a favorable impact on containing coronavirus exposure. As shown by the innovation accounting matrix, carbon pricing would drastically decrease coronavirus cases' exposure over a time horizon. The study concludes that climate finance and carbon pricing were critical in improving air quality indicators, which improved countries' health and wealth, allowing them to reduce coronavirus infections via sustainable healthcare reforms.

Indexed as

COVID-19CarbonCarbon DioxideCosts and Cost AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesEconomic DevelopmentHealth PolicyHumansLiteracyCarbonCarbon DioxideCarbon pricingClimate financingCOVID-19 casesFinancial literacyGeneralized linear modelPopulation density

Identifiers

PMID35064505
PMCPMC8782217
OpenAlexW4207013355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.