ArticleInternational journal of implant dentistry2022
Influence of the bone graft materials used for guided bone regeneration on subsequent peri-implant inflammation: an experimental ligature-induced peri-implantitis model in Beagle dogs.
Article in International journal of implant dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- 3D-printed nHA/PA66 porous scaffold: Regulating immune balance and vascularization synergistically promotes bone regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Clinical Efficacy of Membrane-Assisted Regenerative Therapy in Peri-Implantitis Management: A Comprehensive Review Incorporating Systematic Review Evidence.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The efficacy of a novel porcine-derived collagen membrane on guided bone regeneration: a comparative study in canine model.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Longitudinal comparative study on osteogenic capacity using two collagenated xenografts in artificial bone defects in beagles.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Volume change after maxillary sinus floor elevation with apatite carbonate and octacalcium phosphate.International journal of implant dentistry · 2024Article
- Clinical outcomes of periodontal regenerative therapy with carbonate apatite granules for treatments of intrabony defects, Class II and Class III furcation involvements: A 9-month prospective pilot clinical study.Regenerative therapy · 2023Article
- Bone Grafts in Dental Medicine: An Overview of Autografts, Allografts and Synthetic Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Modelling skeletal pain harnessing tissue engineering.In vitro models · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to histologically evaluate the influence of bone materials used during guided bone regeneration (GBR) on subsequent peri-implantitis in an experimental ligature-induced peri-implantitis model in beagle dogs.
methodsBilateral mandibular premolars (PM2-4) were extracted from six beagle dogs. After 3 months, standardized bone defects (3 mm [mesio-distal width] × 2 mm [bucco-lingual width] × 3 mm [depth]) were created in the experimental group, with simultaneous dental implant placement at the center of the defects. The defects were randomly filled with either autograft (AG) or deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and covered with a collagen membrane. In the control group, implant fixtures were placed without creating an intrabony defect. After 3 months, a healing abutment was placed. Four weeks later, a 3-0 silk thread was ligated around the implants to induce peri-implantitis. After 4 weeks, the specimens were dissected and histologically examined.
resultsThere were no clinical findings of inflammation until silk thread ligation. Four weeks after the onset of peri-implantitis, gingival redness and swelling were seen with mild resorption of the peri-implant bone on dental radiographs. There were no significant differences between the AG, DBBM, and control groups for the following parameters: bone-to-implant contact, distance from the implant shoulder to the base of the bone defect, area of bone defect, and area of new bone.
conclusionsWithin the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that peri-implant tissues after GBR using AG and DBBM underwent the same degree of bone resorption by peri-implantitis as the no defect group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.