Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35064339›Full record

Observational studyAesthetic plastic surgery2022

One-Stage Mastopexy-Lipofilling after Implant Removal in Cosmetic Breast Surgery.

Maria Lucia Mangialardi, Camille Ozil, Cristophe Lepage

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Revision Mastopexy in Aesthetic Breast Surgery.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Systematic Review of Patient Satisfaction Following Mastopexy Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Kite Mastopexy: Small Scar and Tissue-conserving Technique.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Maria Lucia MangialardiHôpital américain de Paris, 63, boulevard Victor-Hugo, Via Nomentana 295, Roma 00161, 92200, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France. marialucia.mangialardi@hotmail.it.ORCID 0000-0002-4826-887X
Camille OzilHôpital américain de Paris, 63, boulevard Victor-Hugo, Via Nomentana 295, Roma 00161, 92200, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
Cristophe LepageHôpital américain de Paris, 63, boulevard Victor-Hugo, Via Nomentana 295, Roma 00161, 92200, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
Hôpital américain de paris · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRevising unsatisfactory outcomes in breast augmentation represents one of the most challenging procedures in aesthetic breast surgery. Different techniques for revising unsatisfactory outcomes in breast augmentation have been described, which can be summarized in two options: implant replacement procedures and implant explantation procedures. Implant explantation procedures can be performed alone or in combination with other techniques to restore volume. Depending on the native volume, the shape and the elasticity of the remaining breast tissue, implant removal can be also associated with mastopexy, auto-augmentation mammoplasty or fat graft. This article portrays our series of combined mastopexy and lipofilling after implant explantation for revising unsatisfactory outcomes of breast augmentation. MATERIAL AND

methodA prospective observational study was performed including all patients underwent cosmetic one-stage mastopexy-lipofilling after implant removal. Collected data included patient's age and BMI, smoking, previous scar location (periareolar, inframammary fold or trans-axillary), implant characteristics (size and location), reason why patient wants to remove the implant (capsular contracture, implant rupture, animation deformity, chronic pain, asymmetry), mean liposuction and fat injection volume, type of capsulectomy, mean operating time and postoperative complications. Cosmetic results and patient satisfaction were evaluated using the 5 points Likert scale and BreastQ reduction/mastopexy module, respectively.

resultsA total of 14 patients (28 breasts) were included with a mean follow-up of 11.3 months. Mean liposuction and injection volumes were 980 mL and 295 mL, respectively. Regarding breast volume, a reduction in one-cup size was noted in 100% of cases. Only one patient (7.69%) requested additional breast volume and underwent a second fat grafting session. Regarding aesthetic outcomes, the mean scores for breast volume, shape, symmetry, quality of scars, nipple-areola complex and donor site shape were 4.2, 4.2, 4.9, 4, 4.3 and 4.7, respectively. BreastQ showed an improvement of patients reported satisfaction with a median (Quartile Rank) score increase of 19 points for the "satisfaction with breast" domain (p < .00001) and a decrease of 17 points for the "physical well-being" domain (p < .00001). "Satisfaction with outcomes" median (Quartile Rank) score was 72.

conclusionCombined mastopexy and lipofilling after implant removal represents a new tool in plastic surgeon armamentarium. This technique is indicated in patients who do not desire anymore breast implant, presenting ptosis of the remaining breast gland and donor site availability. Our article suggested that combined mastopexy and lipofilling achieves satisfactory aesthetic results and excellent patient-reported outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Breast ImplantationBreast ImplantsBreast NeoplasmsMammaplastyCicatrixCohort StudiesEstheticsFemaleHumansNipplesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeImplant removalLipofillingMastopexy

Identifiers

PMID35064339
OpenAlexW4206901687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.