Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35064338›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2022

Reverse Expansion Following Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: A Natural, Safe and Effective Autologous Technique for Breast Reconstruction.

Elena Lucattelli, Federico Cattin, Federico Cipriani, Laura Dellachiesa, Tommaso Fogacci, Gianluca Frisoni, Domenico Samorani, Gloria Semprini, Luca Fabiocchi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elena LucattelliPlastic and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Careggi University Hospital, AOU Careggi, Largo Piero Palagi 1, 50139, Florence, FI, Italy. elena.lucattelli@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1501-8022
Federico CattinGeneral and Breast Surgery Department, "A Franchini" Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Santarcangelo di Romagna, Italy.
Federico CiprianiGeneral and Breast Surgery Department, "A Franchini" Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Santarcangelo di Romagna, Italy.
Laura DellachiesaGeneral and Breast Surgery Department, "A Franchini" Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Santarcangelo di Romagna, Italy.
Tommaso FogacciGeneral and Breast Surgery Department, "A Franchini" Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Santarcangelo di Romagna, Italy.
Gianluca FrisoniGeneral and Breast Surgery Department, "A Franchini" Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Santarcangelo di Romagna, Italy.
Domenico SamoraniGeneral and Breast Surgery Department, "A Franchini" Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Santarcangelo di Romagna, Italy.
Gloria SempriniGeneral and Breast Surgery Department, "A Franchini" Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Santarcangelo di Romagna, Italy.
Luca FabiocchiGeneral and Breast Surgery Department, "A Franchini" Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Santarcangelo di Romagna, Italy.
Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Della Romagna · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of surgeons choose an implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Nevertheless, lipofilling is a constantly growing technique allowing a complete breast reconstruction without prosthesis. We introduce our experience using reverse expansion for breast reconstruction following a nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with a subpectoral skin expander. In the period January 2010-August 2021, 106 breast reconstruction procedures were performed on 50 patients after a NSM. We harvested an amount of fat tissue using a 2.5 mm liposuction cannula, we centrifuged it 3 min at 4000 rpm and injected in the recipient site using 3 ml syringes and Coleman cannulas. At the beginning of every session, the breast expander was deflated of a saline volume similar to the one of the fat to be injected. We harvested an average of 679.2 ccs of fat per session and injected an average of 319.3 ccs per breast. The mean number of sessions has been 2.4 per breast. The average number of sessions in a radiotreated patients' subgroup has been slightly higher than a control group. The mean follow-up time was 63.5 months and we observed no complications in 105 over 106 procedures. Lipofilling has proven to be a safe and effective technique for complete breast reconstruction. Our procedure considers the use of a breast expander as a device to prepare the recipient site. Reverse expansion after a NSM allows a like-with-like reconstruction and it might be the first reconstructive choice in a selected group of patients.Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Breast ImplantsBreast NeoplasmsMammaplastyFemaleHumansMastectomyNipplesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAutologousBreast reconstructionLipofillingReverse expansionSkin expander

Identifiers

PMID35064338
OpenAlexW4207025933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.