Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35064330›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Feasibility and acceptability of virtual reality for cancer pain in people receiving palliative care: a randomised cross-over study.

Philip D Austin, Philip J Siddall, Melanie R Lovell

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06328751 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Study With Cancer Patients at the CECON Foundation's Pain Therapy and Palliative Care Service: Meditation With Immersive Virtual Reality for Pain Relief

TypeinterventionalSponsorEmily Santos MontarroyosRan2024 to 2027Enrolled129ConditionsCancer Pain, Quality of Life, Palliative MedicineArmsCase group, Active control group, Passive control group
NCT07124598 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Virtual Intelligence for Transformative Lifestyle Solutions in Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorMontefiore Medical CenterRan2026 to 2026Enrolled15ConditionsChronic PainArmsVR Headset Device - Meta Quest 3
NCT07567391 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Virtual Reality Nature Therapy for Palliative Patients and Caregivers in Saudi Arabia: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Support Quality of Life and Cultural Adaptation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BishaRan2026 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsVirtual Reality, Quality of Life, Palliative Care, CaregiversArmsImmersive Nature VR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Virtual reality as a non-pharmacological adjuvant for anxiety in oncology care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Application of virtual reality for supportive care in cancer patients: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Virtual reality for outpatient management of cancer pain: a pilot dosing study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Effect of virtual reality-based education on death literacy and health among family caregivers: an experimental study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Virtual Reality Interventions and Chronic Pain: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  16. Experience of breast cancer patients participating in a virtual reality psychological rehabilitation: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Virtual reality technology for pain management in advanced cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Philip D AustinDepartment of Palliative Care, HammondCare, Greenwich Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. paustin@hammond.com.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4627-5873
Philip J SiddallDepartment of Pain Management, HammondCare, Greenwich Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Melanie R LovellDepartment of Palliative Care, HammondCare, Greenwich Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUGreenwich Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextPain management in palliative care remains inadequate; the development of innovative therapeutic options is needed.

objectivesTo determine the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness for larger randomised controlled trials of 3D head-mounted (HMD) virtual reality (VR) for managing cancer pain (CP) in adults.

methodsThirteen people receiving palliative care participated in a single-session randomised cross-over trial, after which they completed a qualitative semi-structured interview. We also compared the effects of 3D HMD VR and 2D screen applications on CP intensity and levels of perceived presence. Feasibility was assessed with recruitment, completion rates and time required to recruit target sample.

resultsAlthough recruitment was slow, completion rate was high (93%). Participants reported that the intervention was acceptable and caused few side effects. Although participants reported significantly reduced CP intensity after 3D HMD VR (1.9 ± 1.8, P = .003) and 2D screen applications (1.5 ± 1.6, P = .007), no significant differences were found between interventions (-.38 ± 1.2, 95% CI: -1.1-.29, P = .23). Participants reported significantly higher levels of presence with the 3D HMD VR compared to 2D screen (60.7 ± SD 12.4 versus 34.3 ± SD 17.1, mean 95% CI: 16.4-40.7, P = .001). Increased presence was associated with significantly lower pain intensity (mean 95% CI: -.04--0.01, P = 0.02).

conclusionsOur preliminary findings support growing evidence that both 3D and 2D virtual applications provide pain relief for people receiving palliative care. Given the relative lack of cybersickness and increasing access to portable VR, we suggest that larger clinical studies are warranted.

Indexed as

Cancer PainNeoplasmsVirtual RealityAdultCross-Over StudiesFeasibility StudiesHumansPalliative CareCancer painPain reliefPalliative carePresenceVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID35064330
PMCPMC8782583
OpenAlexW4220877722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.