ArticlePediatric radiology2022
Assessment of germinal matrix hemorrhage on head ultrasound with deep learning algorithms.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and validation of a cranial ultrasound imaging-based deep learning model for periventricular-intraventricular haemorrhage detection and grading: a two-centre study.Pediatric radiology · 2025Observational
- Deep learning approach for screening neonatal cerebral lesions on ultrasound in China.Nature communications · 2025Article
- CLIF-Net: Intersection-guided Cross-view Fusion Network for Infection Detection from Cranial Ultrasound.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Current progress and future prospects of machine learning in the diagnosis of neonatal encephalopathy: a narrative review.Translational pediatrics · 2025Review
- Deep Learning Approaches for the Assessment of Germinal Matrix Hemorrhage Using Neonatal Head Ultrasound.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The past, current, and future of neonatal intensive care units with artificial intelligence: a systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGerminal matrix hemorrhage-intraventricular hemorrhage is among the most common intracranial complications in premature infants. Early detection is important to guide clinical management for improved patient prognosis.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess whether a convolutional neural network (CNN) can be trained via transfer learning to accurately diagnose germinal matrix hemorrhage on head ultrasound. MATERIALS AND
methodsOver a 10-year period, 400 head ultrasounds performed in patients ages 6 months or younger were reviewed. Key sagittal images at the level of the caudothalamic groove were obtained from 200 patients with germinal matrix hemorrhage and 200 patients without hemorrhage; all images were reviewed by a board-certified pediatric radiologist. One hundred cases were randomly allocated from the total for validation and an additional 100 for testing of a CNN binary classifier. Transfer learning and data augmentation were used to train the model.
resultsThe median age of patients was 0 weeks old with a median gestational age of 30 weeks. The final trained CNN model had a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.92 on the validation set and accuracy of 0.875 on the test set, with 95% confidence intervals of [0.86, 0.98] and [0.81, 0.94], respectively.
conclusionA CNN trained on a small set of images with data augmentation can detect germinal matrix hemorrhage on head ultrasounds with strong accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.