Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35064320›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

International survey among surgeons on laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: the gap between guidelines and reality.

Mahdi Al-Taher, Nariaki Okamoto, Didier Mutter, Laurents P S Stassen, Jacques Marescaux, Michele Diana, Bernard Dallemagne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Best Evidence for Each Surgical Step in Minimally Invasive Right Hemicolectomy: A Systematic Review.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mahdi Al-Taher *IRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France.
Nariaki Okamoto *IRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France. nariaki.okamoto@ircad.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7930-0633
Didier MutterIRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France.
Laurents P S StassenDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jacques MarescauxIRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France.
Michele DianaIRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France.
Bernard DallemagneIRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo assess the current approaches and perioperative treatments of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRHC) and to highlight similarities and differences with international guidelines and scientific evidence, we conducted a survey for surgeons across the globe.

methodsAll digestive and colorectal surgeons registered with the database of the Research Institute against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD) were invited to take part in the survey via email and through the social media networks of IRCAD.

resultsThere were a total of 440 respondents from 78 countries. Most surgeons worked in the European region (38.6%) followed by the Americas (34.1%), the Eastern Mediterranean region (13.0%), the South-East Asian region (5.9%), the Western Pacific region (4.8%), and Africa (3.2%) respectively. Over half of the respondents performed less than 25% of right hemicolectomies laparoscopically where 4 ports are usually used by 68% of the surgeons. The medial-to-lateral, vessel-first approach is the approach most commonly used (74.1%). The most common extraction site was through a midline incision (53%) and an abdominal drain tube is routinely used by 52% of the surgeons after surgery. A total of 68.6% of the responding surgeons perform the majority of the anastomoses extracorporeally. Finally, we found that the majority of responders (60.7%) routinely used mechanical bowel preparations prior to LRHC.

conclusionRegarding several topics related to LRHC care, a discrepancy was observed between the current medical practice and the recommendations from RCTs and international guidelines and significant regional differences were observed.

Indexed as

LaparoscopySurgeonsColectomyHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesInternational guidelinesInternational surveyLaparoscopic right hemicolectomy

Identifiers

PMID35064320
PMCPMC8782220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.