Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35064315›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Diagnostic performance of electron-density dual-energy CT in detection of cervical disc herniation in comparison with standard gray-scale CT and virtual non-calcium images.

Euddeum Shim, Baek Hyun Kim, Woo Young Kang, Suk-Joo Hong, Chang Ho Kang, Kyung-Sik Ahn, Hyeonbin Lee, Thomas J Kwack

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Euddeum ShimDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, 123, Jeokgeum-ro, Danwon-gu, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea, 15355.
Baek Hyun KimDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, 123, Jeokgeum-ro, Danwon-gu, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea, 15355. kimbaekh@daum.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3284-1803
Woo Young KangDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Suk-Joo HongDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chang Ho KangDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyung-Sik AhnDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyeonbin LeeDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Thomas J KwackDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, 123, Jeokgeum-ro, Danwon-gu, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea, 15355.
Korea University · KRKorea University Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT (DECT) with electron-density (ED) image reconstruction compared with standard CT (SC) and virtual non-calcium (VNCa) image CT reconstruction for detecting cervical disc herniation.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was approved by the IRB. We enrolled 64 patients (336 intervertebral discs from C2/3 to C7/T1; mean age, 55 years; 17 women and 47 men) who underwent DECT with spectral reconstruction and 3-T MRI within 2 weeks between January 2018 and June 2020. Four radiologists independently evaluated the first image set of randomized SC, VNCa, and ED images to detect cervical disc herniation. After 8 weeks, the readers re-evaluated the second and the last image sets with an 8-week interval. MRI evaluations performed by two other experienced served as the reference standard. Comparing diagnostic performance between each images set was evaluated by a generalized estimating equation.

resultsA total of 233 cervical disc herniations were noted on MRI. For detecting cervical disc herniation, electron-density images showed higher sensitivity (94% [219/233; 95% CI, 90-97] vs. 76% [177/233; 70-81] vs. 69% [160/233; 62-76]) (p < 0.001) and similar specificity (90% [93/103; 83-95] vs. 89% [92/103; 82-96] vs. 90% [93/103; 83-95]) (p > 0.05) as SC and VNCa images, respectively. Inter-reader agreement for cervical disc herniation calculated among the four readers was moderate for all image sets (κ = 0.558 for ED, κ = 0.422 for SC, and κ = 0.449 for VNCa).

conclusionDECT with ED reconstruction can improve cervical disc herniation detection and diagnostic confidence compared with SC and VNCa images. KEY POINTS: • Intervertebral discs with high material density are well visualized on electron-density images obtained from dual-energy CT. • Electron-density images showed much higher sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy than standard CT and virtual non-calcium images for the detection of cervical disc herniation. • Electron-density images can have false-negative results, especially for disc herniation with high signal intensity on T2W images and can show pseudo-disc extrusion at the lower cervical spine.

Indexed as

Intervertebral Disc DisplacementBone MarrowCalciumCross-Sectional StudiesEdemaElectronsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedCalciumCervical vertebraeDual-energy computed tomographyIntervertebral disc diseaseMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID35064315
PMCPMC8782689
OpenAlexW4207073937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.