ArticleInternational orthopaedics2022
Outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty using the modular dual mobility acetabular system to treat recurrent dislocation.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Chronic Opioid Use in Recurrent Dislocations following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Iatrogenic Charcot-Like Arthropathy Case Report.Hip & pelvis · 2026Article
- Dual-mobility implants in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024Review
- Is Modular Dual Mobility Superior to Standard Bearings for Reducing Dislocation Risk after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Retrospective Comparative Multicenter Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecurrent dislocation is a difficult complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision THA using the modular dual mobility (MDM) acetabular system to treat recurrent dislocation.
methodsBetween March 2015 and February 2019, 34 revision THAs were performed using the MDM system for treating recurrent dislocation in a single institution. Of these, 32 revision THAs (32 patients) that satisfied a minimum follow-up of one year (mean, 4 years) were included in this study. Patient-reported outcomes, complication rates, and radiographic results were evaluated.
resultsSeventeen patients (53.1%) had lumbar degenerative kyphosis, and six (18.8%) had surgically fused lumbar spines during the index operation. All acetabular components were revised, whereas femoral stems were retained in 29 patients (90.6%). No redislocation or intraprosthetic dislocation was noted after revision. One additional revision was required for acetabular loosening with periprosthetic joint infection. No additional revision was performed for aseptic loosening. A partial radiolucent line was found in two hips (6.3%) confined to one acetabular zone.
conclusionsRevision THA using the MDM system was effective in treating recurrent dislocation in a group of patients with a high prevalence of lumbar spinal pathology. During a mean follow-up of 4 years, one additional revision THA was performed for septic loosening and none for aseptic loosening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.