Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35064234›Full record

ReviewMolecular psychiatry2022

Minimum and optimal numbers of psychiatric beds: expert consensus using a Delphi process.

Adrian P Mundt, Enzo Rozas Serri, Matías Irarrázaval, Richard O'Reilly, Stephen Allison, Tarun Bastiampillai, Seggane Musisi, Ashraf Kagee, Andrei Golenkov, Joseph El-Khoury and 3 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Penumbra of the pandemic workplace for psychiatrists and trainees in Australia.Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Real-world performance of Victorian hospitals during the COVID-19 lockdowns.Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Adrian P MundtFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile. adrian.mundt@mail.udp.cl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8763-4601
Enzo Rozas SerriFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5625-2691
Matías IrarrázavalMinistry of Health, Republic of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Richard O'ReillyDepartment of Psychiatry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Stephen AllisonDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Tarun BastiampillaiVisiting Clinical Professor Department of Psychiatry Monash University Wellington Road, Clayton, 3800, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6931-2913
Seggane MusisiDepartment of Psychiatry School of Medicine, Mulago Hospital, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3454-0000
Ashraf KageeDepartment of Psychology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1241-2566
Andrei GolenkovPsychiatry and Medical Psychology, Chuvash State University, Cheboksary, Russian Federation.
Joseph El-KhouryDepartment of Psychiatry, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4529-6840
Seon-Cheol ParkDepartment of Psychiatry, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3691-4624
Lydia ChwastiakDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4159-7934
Stefan PriebeUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry (WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Service Development), Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9864-3394

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The required minimum number of psychiatric inpatient beds is highly debated and has substantial resource implications. The present study used the Delphi method to try to reach a global consensus on the minimum and optimal psychiatric bed numbers. An international board of scientific advisors nominated the Delphi panel members. In the first round, the expert panel provided responses exploring estimate ranges for a minimum to optimal numbers of psychiatric beds and three levels of shortage. In a second round, the panel reconsidered their responses using the input from the total group to achieve consensus. The Delphi panel comprised 65 experts (42% women, 54% based in low- and middle-income countries) from 40 countries in the six regions of the World Health Organization. Sixty psychiatric beds per 100 000 population were considered optimal and 30 the minimum, whilst 25-30 was regarded as mild, 15-25 as moderate, and less than 15 as severe shortage. This is the first expert consensus on minimum and optimal bed numbers involving experts from HICs and LMICs. Many high-income countries have psychiatric bed numbers that fall within the recommended range. In contrast, the number of beds in many LMIC is below the minimum recommended rate.

Indexed as

ConsensusDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID35064234
PMCPMC8780043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.