ArticleScientific reports2022
Unique high Arctic methane metabolizing community revealed through in situ
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Syntrophic interactions driving anaerobic methane oxidation in deep-sea cold seeps revealed by DNA-SIP.iScience · 2026Article
- Methanotrophs and methane oxidation in cold wetlands: distribution, ecology, and mechanisms.ISME communications · 2026Review
- Identification of microbial groups and functional genes associated with greenhouse gas emissions in prawn farms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Expansion of aerobic methanotrophy to the phylum of Actinomycetota and its environmental implications.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Methane-cycling microbiomes in soils of the pan-Arctic and their response to permafrost degradation.Communications earth & environment · 2025Article
- Viral potential to modulate microbial methane metabolism varies by habitat.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Molecular identification of methane-consuming bacteria in the Persian Gulf: a study for microbial gas exploration.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- 'Follow the Water': Microbial Water Acquisition in Desert Soils.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Global patterns of diversity and metabolism of microbial communities in deep-sea hydrothermal vent deposits.Microbiome · 2022Article
- The activity and functions of soil microbial communities in the Finnish sub-Arctic vary across vegetation types.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from Arctic permafrost soils create a positive feedback loop of climate warming and further GHG emissions. Active methane uptake in these soils can reduce the impact of GHG on future Arctic warming potential. Aerobic methane oxidizers are thought to be responsible for this apparent methane sink, though Arctic representatives of these organisms have resisted culturing efforts. Here, we first used in situ gas flux measurements and qPCR to identify relative methane sink hotspots at a high Arctic cytosol site, we then labeled the active microbiome in situ using DNA Stable Isotope Probing (SIP) with heavy
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.