ArticleScientific reports2022
AI-based atomic force microscopy image analysis allows to predict electrochemical impedance spectra of defects in tethered bilayer membranes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- On machine learning analysis of atomic force microscopy images for image classification, sample surface recognition.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2024Review
- Phenotyping senescent mesenchymal stromal cells using AI image translation.Current research in biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) image analysis of supported bilayers, such as tethered bilayer membranes (tBLMs) can reveal the nature of the membrane damage by pore-forming proteins and predict the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) response of such objects. However, automated analysis involving pore detection in such images is often non-trivial and can require AI-based object detection techniques. The specific object-detection algorithm we used to determine the defect coordinates in real AFM images was a convolutional neural network (CNN). Defect coordinates allow to predict the EIS response of tBLMs populated by the pore-forming toxins using finite element analysis (FEA) modeling. We tested if the accuracy of the CNN algorithm affected the EIS spectral features sensitive to defect densities and other physical parameters of tBLMs. We found that the EIS spectra can be predicted sufficiently well, however, systematic errors of characteristic spectral points were observed and need to be taken into account. Importantly, the comparison of predicted EIS curves with experimental ones allowed to estimate important physical parameters of tBLMs such as the specific resistance of submembrane reservoir. This reservoir separates phospholipid bilayer from the solid support. We found that the specific resistance of the reservoir amounts to [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] which is approximately two orders of a magnitude higher compared to the specific resistance of the buffer bathing tBLMs studied in this work. We hypothesize that such effect may be related in part due to decreased concentration of ionic carriers in the submembrane due to decreased relative dielectric permittivity in this region.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.