Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35064130›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Quantification of surface charging memory effect in ionization wave dynamics.

Pedro Viegas, Elmar Slikboer, Zdenek Bonaventura, Enric Garcia-Caurel, Olivier Guaitella, Ana Sobota, Anne Bourdon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Pedro ViegasDepartment of Physical Electronics, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. viegas@mail.muni.cz.
Elmar SlikboerLaboratoire de Physique des Plasmas (LPP), CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris Saclay, École Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91128, Palaiseau, France.
Zdenek BonaventuraDepartment of Physical Electronics, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Enric Garcia-CaurelLaboratoire de Physique des Interfaces et des Couches Minces (LPICM), CNRS, École Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91120, Palaiseau, France.
Olivier GuaitellaLaboratoire de Physique des Plasmas (LPP), CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris Saclay, École Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91128, Palaiseau, France.
Ana SobotaDepartment of Applied Physics, EPG, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Anne BourdonLaboratoire de Physique des Plasmas (LPP), CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris Saclay, École Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91128, Palaiseau, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRMasaryk University · CZEindhoven University of Technology · NLLaboratoire de Physique des Interfaces et des Couches Minces · FRUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dynamics of ionization waves (IWs) in atmospheric pressure discharges is fundamentally determined by the electric polarity (positive or negative) at which they are generated and by the presence of memory effects, i.e. leftover charges and reactive species that influence subsequent IWs. This work examines and compares positive and negative IWs in pulsed plasma jets (1 [Formula: see text]s on-time), showing the difference in their nature and the different resulting interaction with a dielectric BSO target. For the first time, it is shown that a surface charging memory effect is produced, i.e. that a significant amount of surface charges and electric field remain in the target in between discharge pulses (200 [Formula: see text]s off-time). This memory effect directly impacts IW dynamics and is especially important when using negative electric polarity. The results suggest that the remainder of surface charges is due to the lack of charged particles in the plasma near the target, which avoids a full neutralization of the target. This demonstration and the quantification of the memory effect are possible for the first time by using an unique approach, assessing the electric field inside a dielectric material through the combination of an advanced experimental technique called Mueller polarimetry and state-of-the-art numerical simulations.

Identifiers

PMID35064130
PMCPMC8782963
OpenAlexW4205222136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.