Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35064038›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2022

Imaging in paratesticular lesions.

Ashwini Sankhe, Pareekshith Rai

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ashwini SankheDepartment of Radiology, LTMMC and GH, Mumbai, India.
Pareekshith RaiDepartment of Radiology, LTMMC and GH, Mumbai, India paree_44@yahoo.co.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9189-6097
Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital and Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 23-year-old male presented with complaints of gradually increasing swelling of the left hemiscrotum. Preliminary ultrasound scan revealed a heterogeneous, predominantly solid lesion showing raised internal vascularity with few cystic areas in the paratesticular region, towards the midline with both testes seen separately from the lesion. To rule out presence of locoregional or distant metastases, a CT scan was done which revealed a well-defined, intrascotal, extratesticular, heterogeneous, moderately enhancing mass lesion with cystic areas in the scrotal sac with no significant lymphadenopathy or obvious distant metastasis. Subsequent MRI done for surgical planning revealed a heterogeneous signal intensity lesion with cystic areas and areas of haemorrhage with focal loss of fat planes with the left corpora cavernosa at the root of the penis. The patient underwent an inguinoscrotal exploration with excision of the left paratesticular mass. Final histopathology suggested an undifferentiated high grade pleomorphic sarcoma. Paratesticular tumours while rare are an important cause of scrotal swelling. Exact histological identification of tumour subtype is not possible based on imaging but preoperative multi-modality imaging has an important role in identifying tissue of origin, differentiating benign from malignant lesions, surgical planning and assessing the need for adjuvant CT/RT.

Indexed as

Genital Diseases, MaleGenital Neoplasms, MaleAdultHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleScrotumUltrasonographyYoung Adultradiologysurgical oncologyurological surgery

Identifiers

PMID35064038
PMCPMC8785160
OpenAlexW4206956386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.