Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35063953›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2022

Perspectives of mild asthma patients on maintenance versus as-needed preventer treatment regimens: a qualitative study.

Juliet Foster, Richard Beasley, Irene Braithwaite, Tim Harrison, Mark Holliday, Ian Pavord, Helen Reddel

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Questions in Mild Asthma: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. "As-Needed" Inhaled Corticosteroids for Patients With Asthma.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Juliet FosterThe Woolcock Institute of Medical Research and The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0780-6034
Richard BeasleyMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0337-406X
Irene BraithwaiteMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5327-3027
Tim HarrisonNottingham Respiratory Medicine Unit and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3065-8247
Mark HollidayMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-2344-6091
Ian PavordRespiratory Medicine Unit and Oxford Respiratory NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4288-5973
Helen ReddelThe Woolcock Institute of Medical Research and The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia helen.reddel@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6695-6350
Medical Research Institute of New Zealand · NZThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAs-needed low-dose combination budesonide-formoterol is recommended by asthma guidelines in many countries as an alternative to maintenance inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for treatment of mild asthma, but there are few data on patient attitudes toward these regimens. This study explored the comparative implementation experiences and future treatment preferences of mild asthma patients who had experienced these two treatment regimens.

settingA subgroup of adults randomised to maintenance ICS or as-needed ICS-formoterol in a multinational, 52-week open-label randomised controlled trial (NovelSTART) in mild asthma patients were interviewed to explore their motivations for treatment use during the study and their preferences for future treatment.

participantsSemistructured interviews were conducted with 74 participants (Maintenance group: n=39, As-needed group n=35, mean age 38 (range 19-69)) and thematically analysed from transcribed audiorecordings.

resultsEmergent themes from analysis comprised: 'How much my asthma affects me' (how their asthma's impact affected their self-management motivation); 'What I know about asthma' (limited knowledge impeded appropriate self-management decision making); 'How much effort this treatment regimen involves for me' (treatment complexity and/or difficulty establishing a medication routine impeded implementation, particularly in the Maintenance group); and 'My beliefs about the benefits and risks of this treatment' (patients who considered their treatment as ineffective, eg, limited difference in symptoms relative to salbutamol (both groups) or slower onset of relief (As-needed group) had poor motivation to use the treatment). Due to the simplicity of the as-needed combination strategy, this was the preferred future regimen, even by patients who had not yet tried it.

conclusionsKey patient perspectives on the implementation of preventer treatments for mild asthma included factors relating to perceived asthma burden, disease knowledge, treatment complexity and treatment usefulness or safety. The as-needed budesonide-formoterol regimen was preferred to maintenance ICS treatment in mild asthma though patient education is urgently needed to address implementation motivation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12615000999538.

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaAdministration, InhalationAdultBronchodilator AgentsBudesonideBudesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug CombinationHumansAnti-Asthmatic AgentsBronchodilator AgentsBudesonideBudesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combinationasthmageneral medicine (see internal medicine)primary carequalitative researchquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID35063953
PMCPMC8785165
OpenAlexW4206986596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.