SynthesisDrug and alcohol dependence2022
E-cigarette device type and combustible tobacco use: Results from a pooled analysis of 10,482 youth.
Synthesis in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characteristics associated with device type used among middle school and high school students who currently used E-cigarettes in the U.S., 2023.Preventive medicine · 2026Article
- Use of multiple devices among U.S. adults frequently using ENDS in 2023.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2025Article
- Health Risks Associated with Adopting New-Generation Disposable Products Among Young Adults Who Use E-Cigarettes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Understanding adolescent consumption patterns and attitudes towards the "puff" on the path to a smoke-free generation: a 2022 French perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Electronic Cigarettes: A Pro-Con Review of the Current Literature.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTo understand whether using a certain e-cigarette device is more strongly associated with risk of combustible tobacco use among youth.
methodsWe conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses using cross-sectional data from 4 samples of youth in Connecticut and California (N = 10,482; ages 13-24), separately for each study using the total sample and the sample of past-month e-cigarette users, to understand the association between e-cigarette device type and past-month combustible tobacco use, while controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, school, and past-month marijuana use. Then, we conducted meta-analyses to calculate pooled associations for adolescents, young adults, and all individuals combined.
resultsAmong the total sample, combustible tobacco use was associated with any e-cigarette device use (vs. no e-cigarette use) in the pooled analysis across all studies. Among past-month e-cigarette users, combustible tobacco use across all studies was 15.8%- 61.5%. Pooled associations among past-month e-cigarette users showed that using disposable devices (vs. pods; AOR=2.83, 95% CI: 1.73-4.61) and multiple devices most frequently (vs. pods; AOR=2.13, 95% CI: 1.16-3.90) was associated with greater odds of combustible tobacco use. Pooled associations also found that using multiple devices (vs. a single device) in the past month was associated with greater odds of combustible tobacco use (AOR 2.33, 95% CI: 1.74, 3.14). DISCUSSION: Using disposable e-cigarettes and multiple devices is associated with greater likelihood of combustible tobacco use among e-cigarette using youth. Future research should elucidate the trajectory of e-cigarette device used and combustible tobacco use among youth to inform prevention and product regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.