Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35063753›Full record

ArticleInternational immunopharmacology2022

What is the impact and efficacy of routine immunological, biochemical and hematological biomarkers as predictors of COVID-19 mortality?

Mehmet Tahir Huyut, Zübeyir Huyut, Fatih İlkbahar, Cuma Mertoğlu

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International immunopharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Early prediction of severe COVID-19 in patients with Sjögren's syndrome].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mehmet Tahir HuyutErzincan Binali Yıldırım Unversıty, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Erzincan, Türkiye. Electronic address: tahir.huyut@erzincan.edu.tr.
Zübeyir HuyutVan Yuzuncu Yıl University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, Van, Türkiye.
Fatih İlkbaharDuzce Unıversıty, Department of Management Informatıon Systems, Düzce, Türkiye.
Cuma MertoğluErzincan Binali Yıldırım Unversıty, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Erzincan, Türkiye; Inonu University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Malatya, Türkiye.
Düzce Üniversitesi · TRErzincan University · TRInonu University · TRVan Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It remains important to investigate the changing and impact of routine blood values (RBVs) in order to predict mortality and follow an appropriate treatment in COVID-19 patients. In the study, the importance of RBVs in the mortality of patients with COVID-19 was investigated. The changes in the biochemical, hematological, and immunological parameters of patients who recovered (n = 4364) and died (n = 233) from COVID-19 over time and their relationship with the mortality of the disease were evaluated retrospectively. Odds ratios of the parameters affecting one-month mortality were calculated by running multiple-logistic-regression analysis. The cut off values and diagnostic efficiencies of the parameters that posed a risk for mortality were obtained via receiver operating curve analysis. It was determined that the C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, procalcitonin, erythrocyte-sedimentation-rate (ESR), troponin values were at abnormal levels until death occurred in the patients who died. In addition, the procalcitonin levels were consistently high in patients who died. The patients who died generally had a sustained increase in their leukocyte and neutrophil levels and biochemical variables, and an ongoing decrease in lymphopenia and eosinopenia levels. Although significant changes were observed in liver function tests, cardiac troponin, hemogram values, kidney function tests and parameters related to inflammation in deceased patients, high ESR, international-normalized-ratio (INR), prothrombin-time (PT), CRP, D-dimer, ferritin and red-cell-distribution width (RDW) values, respectively, were the most effective predictive mortality risk biomarkers of COVID-19. In addition, neutrophilia, leukocytosis, thrombocytopenia, erythrocytopenia were other risk predictors of mortality. Indicators was found in this study can be successfully used to predict mortality from COVID-19.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersBlood SedimentationCOVID-19C-Reactive ProteinErythrocyte IndicesFemaleFerritinsFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsHumansInternational Normalized RatioLeukocyte CountMaleBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinFerritinsFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment DProcalcitoninTroponinCOVID-19ErythrocytopeniaHypercoagulationLeukocytosisMortality risk indicatorsRoutine laboratory characteristics

Identifiers

PMID35063753
PMCPMC8761578
OpenAlexW4206271482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.