Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35063360›Full record

SynthesisTransfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis2022

Lessons learned from the use of convalescent plasma for the treatment of COVID-19 and specific considerations for immunocompromised patients.

Mickael Beraud, Erin Goodhue Meyer, Miquel Lozano, Aicha Bah, Ralph Vassallo, Bethany L Brown

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Mickael BeraudTerumo Blood and Cell Technologies Europe NV, Ikaroslaan 41, 1930, Zaventem, Belgium. Electronic address: Mickael.Beraud@terumobct.com.
Erin Goodhue MeyerTerumo Blood and Cell Technologies, 10811 W Collins Ave, Lakewood, CO, 80215, United States. Electronic address: Erin.Goodhue@terumobct.com.
Miquel LozanoDepartment of Hemotherapy and Hemostasis, ICMHO, University Clinic Hospital, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. Electronic address: mlozano@clinic.cat.
Aicha BahTerumo Blood and Cell Technologies Europe NV, Ikaroslaan 41, 1930, Zaventem, Belgium. Electronic address: Aicha.Bah@terumobct.com.
Ralph VassalloVitalant, 6210 E Oak St, Scottsdale, AZ, 85257, United States. Electronic address: RVassallo@vitalant.org.
Bethany L BrownAmerican Red Cross, Biomedical Services, Holland Laboratory for the Biomedical Sciences, 15601 Crabbs Branch Way, Rockville, MD, 20855, United States. Electronic address: bethany.brown2@redcross.org.
Terumo (Belgium) · BEAmerican Red Cross · USHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESTerumo (United States) · USVitalant · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent plasma (CovCP) infusions have been widely used for the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The aims of this narrative review were to analyze the safety and efficacy of CovCP infusions in the overall population and in immunocompromised patients with COVID-19 and to identify the lessons learned concerning the use of convalescent plasma (CP) to fill treatment gaps for emerging viruses. Systematic searches (PubMed, Scopus, and COVID-19 Research) were conducted to identify peer-reviewed articles and pre-prints published between March 1, 2020 and May 1, 2021 on the use of CovCP for the treatment of patients with COVID-19. From 261 retrieved articles, 37 articles reporting robust controlled studies in the overall population of patients with COVID-19 and 9 articles in immunocompromised patients with COVID-19 were selected. While CovCP infusions are well tolerated in both populations, they do not seem to improve clinical outcomes in critically-ill patients with COVID-19 and no conclusion could be drawn concerning their potential benefits in immunocompromised patients with COVID-19. To be better prepared for future epidemics/pandemics and to evaluate potential benefits of CP treatment, only CP units with high neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) titers should be infused in patients with low NAb titers, patient eligibility criteria should be based on the disease pathophysiology, and measured clinical outcomes and methods should be comparable across studies. Even if CovCP infusions did not improve clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19, NAb-containing CP infusions remain a safe, widely available and potentially beneficial treatment option for future epidemics/pandemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 SerotherapyHumansImmunization, PassiveImmunocompromised HostPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Convalescent plasmaCOVID-19EfficacyImmunosuppressionPandemicSafety

Identifiers

PMID35063360
PMCPMC8757642
OpenAlexW4206479903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.