ReviewIndian journal of medical microbiology
COVID-19: a boon or a bane for the microbiologists.
Review in Indian journal of medical microbiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Best Practices in the Management ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the situation where COVID-19 pandemic has placed unprecedented demands and pressure on the health care system, we wanted to analyze how the medical microbiologists of our country were affected. Was it actually an opportunity to showcase the specialty or was it a doom? A debate was organized as a key session in the national e-conference of the Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists, held on 10 December 2020.
objectivesThe objective of the debate was to examine and analyze the various positive as well as negative impacts of COVID-19 on the discipline of the medical microbiology of our country. CONTENT: Before the debate a voting session was conducted to assess the opinion of the audience followed by a very interesting debate where both the speakers presented their view points. The points in favor of the discipline were, mainly up-gradation of the specialty of microbiology in terms of learning, skill development, infrastructure, networking & research opportunities related to COVID-19. While the main points against were, nerve wracking work load without much acknowledgement, performance pressure from hospital administration to maintain rapid turnaround time, and a forceful neglect of all other infectious diseases like tuberculosis and antimicrobial resistance which were the key battle fields of the medical microbiologists. Postgraduate & even undergraduate training programs got completely derailed to their disadvantage. By the end of the debate, it was concluded that COVID-19 was neither a boon nor a bane to the microbiologists. A balanced approach to the problem in hand is required without ignoring the pre-existing infectious diseases in our country. The post debate voting swayed the audience considerably for it to be a bane & the faculty debating for boon had a huge margin to begin with but finally won with a whisker indicating the intensity of the debate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.