Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35063006›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2022

Statistics or biology: the zero-inflation controversy about scRNA-seq data.

Ruochen Jiang, Tianyi Sun, Dongyuan Song, Jingyi Jessica Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 156 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
156citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

156 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Canon enables causal inference of downstream genes in single-cell CRISPR studies via instrumental variable analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Cross-Modal Denoising and Integration of Spatial Multi-Omics Data with CANDIES.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

96 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruochen JiangDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095-1554, CA, USA.
Tianyi SunDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095-1554, CA, USA.
Dongyuan SongBioinformatics Interdepartmental Ph.D. Program, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095-7246, CA, USA.
Jingyi Jessica LiDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095-1554, CA, USA. jli@stat.ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9288-5648

Funding

Statistical Methods for Elucidating Regulatory Mechanisms and Functional Impacts of Transcriptome Variation at Population and Single-Cell ScalesR35GM140888 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LI, JINGYI JESSICA · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
Robust Identification and accurate quantification of RNA transcripts on a system wide scaleR01GM120507 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LI, JINGYI JESSICA · 2016 to 2021
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120507NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM140888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers view vast zeros in single-cell RNA-seq data differently: some regard zeros as biological signals representing no or low gene expression, while others regard zeros as missing data to be corrected. To help address the controversy, here we discuss the sources of biological and non-biological zeros; introduce five mechanisms of adding non-biological zeros in computational benchmarking; evaluate the impacts of non-biological zeros on data analysis; benchmark three input data types: observed counts, imputed counts, and binarized counts; discuss the open questions regarding non-biological zeros; and advocate the importance of transparent analysis.

Indexed as

Single-Cell AnalysisBiologyExome SequencingSequence Analysis, RNA

Identifiers

PMID35063006
PMCPMC8783472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.