Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35062968›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2022

Coverage and determinants of modern contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa: further analysis of demographic and health surveys.

Isaac Boadu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Isaac BoaduDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana. isaacboadu62@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2703-7391

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of modern contraceptives (MC) in most African countries has been low despite the high fertility rate and unmet need for family planning. This study sought to determine the coverage and determinants of modern contraceptive use among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).

methodsData for the study were obtained from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) conducted between 1995-2020 across 37 SSA countries. Women of reproductive age (15-49 years) was the unit of analysis. Analysis of data was done using STATA version 16 for windows. A bivariate Rao Scott's Chi-square test of independence was done to determine factors associated with the use of modern contraceptives. Factors that showed significance (p < 0.05) were included in a multilevel logistic regression to determine significant predictors of modern contraceptives. Clustering, stratification and sample weighting were accounted for in the analyses.

resultsThe overall prevalence of the use of MC was found to be 22.0%. This ranged from 3.5% in the Central Africa Republic to 49.7% in Namibia. The most common type of MC used were injections (39.4%), condoms (17.5%) and implants (26.5%). Women were less likely to use modern contraceptive if they: had no education (aOR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.38-0.44), had no children (aOR = 0.27-0.42), not told of family planning at a health facility (aOR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.67-0.71), not heard of family planning in the media (aOR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.74-0.79) and being poor (aOR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.73-0.79). On the other hand, women were more likely to use modern contraceptive if they were between the age of 35-39 years (aOR = 1.69, 95% CI 0.73-0.79), married (aOR = 2.66, 95% CI 2.50-2.83), had seven or more children (aOR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.17-0.38), had knowledge of any method of contraceptives (aOR = 303.8, 95% CI 89.9-1027.5) and when field worker visited and talked about family planning (aOR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.39-0.68).

conclusionThe study showed a low prevalence of modern contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa. Findings from the study highlight the need to provide education to women to increase uptake of modern contraceptive and also re-enforce contraceptive interventions to improve women's health and well-being.

Indexed as

Contraception BehaviorContraceptive AgentsAdultAfrica South of the SaharaChildContraceptive DevicesFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMarriageContraceptive AgentsContraceptiveCoverageDeterminantsSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID35062968
PMCPMC8781110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.