Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35062895›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Unseen, unheard: a qualitative analysis of women's experiences of exclusively expressing breast milk.

Lisa A Anders, Karen Robinson, Jennifer M Ohlendorf, Lisa Hanson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07268105 (Flange Fitting for NICU Pumping Parents to Explore Improved Milk Production and Satisfaction), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07268105 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Flange Fitting for NICU Pumping Parents to Explore Improved Milk Production and Satisfaction

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Maryland, BaltimoreRan2026 to 2027Enrolled0ConditionsHuman Milk/Breastfeeding, Breast PumpingArmsThe intervention is an educational intervention using the FLANGEFits protocol in the NICU. This protocol has only been used previously in the community.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Flange Size Matters: A Comparative Pilot Study of the Flange FITSJournal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Pumps: A Possible Tool to Promote More Equitable Lactation Outcomes.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa A AndersUniversity of North Carolina at Greensboro School of Nursing, Nursing and Instructional Building, 1007 Walker Avenue, Greensboro, NC, 27412, USA. laanders2@uncg.edu.
Karen RobinsonMarquette University College of Nursing, 510 N 16th St, Milwaukee, WI, 53233, USA.
Jennifer M OhlendorfMarquette University College of Nursing, 510 N 16th St, Milwaukee, WI, 53233, USA.
Lisa HansonMarquette University College of Nursing, 510 N 16th St, Milwaukee, WI, 53233, USA.
Marquette University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Greensboro · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast milk feeding has numerous benefits for women and infants. Positive maternal experiences with breast milk feeding impacts exclusivity, duration, and maternal mental health. Most research focuses on women feeding directly at the breast. Some women elect to feed exclusively expressed milk to their healthy, term infants rather than feed directly at the breast. Little is known about what constitutes a positive experience among this population. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore women's experiences of exclusive expression (EE).

methodsInterviews were conducted via Microsoft Teams to collect qualitative data from a purposive sample of 21 women practicing EE. Interviews were analyzed for themes.

resultsThree themes: Unseen and Unheard, Doing it My Way, and Getting into the Groove, and 8 subthemes: Breast is Best, Missed Opportunities for Healthcare Provider Support, Fighting for it, What Works for Us, A Sense of Control, Preparation, Tricks of the Trade, and Making it Manageable were identified. Despite challenges, including a lack of support from healthcare providers and a lack of acknowledgement as breastfeeding mothers, exclusive expression offered participants a method to continue breast milk feeding in a way that they found to be satisfying.

conclusionThis study provides insight into experiences of exclusive expression that clinicians can use to improve their support of breast milk feeding during perinatal encounters. Societal pressure to feed from the breast may have negative emotional consequences for women electing to exclusively express. There is a need for more information and support for breast milk expression from healthcare providers along with a reframing of how breast milk feeding is discussed and promoted.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingBreast Milk ExpressionFemaleHumansMothersQualitative ResearchBottle feedingBreast feedingBreast milk expressionHuman milkLactationQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID35062895
PMCPMC8781697
OpenAlexW4207037946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.