Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2022
Optimizing left ventricular-arterial coupling during the initial resuscitation in septic shock - a pilot prospective randomized study.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06853574 (Changes in Ventriculo-arterial Coupling and Myocardial Work During Treatment of Sepsis and Septic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Changes in Ventriculo-arterial Coupling and Myocardial Work During Treatment of Sepsis and Septic Shock: a Prospective Interventional Study
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Baseline Ventricular-Arterial Coupling Modifies Left Atrial Pressure Response to Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation In Vitro.Artificial organs · 2026Article
- Review
- A pilot study of the effect of norepinephrine dose on left ventricular-arterial coupling in patients with septic shock.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Femoral Plaque Burden and Left Ventricular-Arterial Coupling in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Ea/Ees and oscillatory power fraction capture complementary but distinct components of ventriculoarterial coupling: a porcine study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Reading discordant bedside indices in sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy: an evidence-mapping framework for diagnosis and trial design.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Hemodynamic effects of volume expansion on left ventricular-arterial interactions in circulatory shock-a prospective observational study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Sepsis and the Heart: In the Quest for Noninvasive Pressure-Volume Loops at the Bedside.Critical care explorations · 2025Article
- Sepsis-induced cardiogenic shock: controversies and evidence gaps in diagnosis and management.Journal of intensive care · 2025Review
- Critical Care Ultrasound in Shock: A Comprehensive Review of Ultrasound Protocol for Hemodynamic Assessment in the Intensive Care Unit.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- U-shaped prognostic value of left ventricular-arterial coupling in septic patients: a prospective study.European journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Ventriculo-arterial (un)coupling in septic shock: Impact of current and upcoming hemodynamic drugs.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Ventriculo-arterial coupling: from physiological concept to clinical application in peri-operative care and ICUs.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2022Review
- Role of Electromechanical Dyssynchrony Assessment During Acute Circulatory Failure and Its Relation to Ventriculo-Arterial Coupling.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeft ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC), defined as the ratio of effective arterial elastance (Ea) to left ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ees), has been extensively described as a key determinant of cardiovascular work efficacy. Previous studies indicated that left ventricular-arterial uncoupling was associated with worse tissue perfusion and increased mortality in shock patients. Therefore, this study aims to investigate whether a resuscitation algorithm based on optimizing left VAC during the initial resuscitation can improve prognosis in patients with septic shock.
methodsThis pilot study was conducted in an intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary teaching hospital in China. A total of 83 septic shock patients with left ventricular-arterial uncoupling (i.e., the Ea/Ees ratio ≥ 1.36) were randomly assigned to receive usual care (usual care group, n = 42) or an algorithm-based resuscitation that attempt to reduce the Ea/Ees ratio to 1 within the first 6 h after randomization (VAC-optimized group, n = 41). The left VAC was evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography every 2 h during the study period. The primary endpoint was 28-days mortality. The secondary endpoints included lactate clearance rate, length of ICU stay, and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).
resultsEighty-two patients (98.8%) completed the study and were included in the final analysis. The Ea/Ees ratio was reduced in both groups, and the decrease in Ea/Ees ratio in the VAC-optimized group was significantly greater than that in the usual care group [median (interquartile range), 0.39 (0.26, 0.45) vs. 0.1 (0.06, 0.22); P < 0.001]. Compared with the usual care group, the VAC-optimized group likely exhibited the potential to reduce the 28-days mortality (33% vs. 50%; log-rank hazard ratio = 0.526, 95% confidence interval: 0.268 to 1.033). Moreover, the VAC-optimized group had a higher lactate clearance rate than the usual care group [27.7 (11.9, 45.7) % vs. 18.3 (- 5.7, 32.1) %; P = 0.038]. No significant difference was observed in terms of the length of ICU stay or duration of IMV.
conclusionsDuring the initial resuscitation of septic shock, optimizing left ventricular-arterial coupling was associated with improved lactate clearance, while likely having a beneficial effect on prognosis.
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900024031 . Registered 23 June 2019 - Retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.