Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35062790›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Associated Factors among Diabetes Patients: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Changzhi, Shanxi, China.

Ying Wang, Lingrui Duan, Mufan Li, Jiayu Wang, Jianzhou Yang, Congying Song, Jing Li, Jinsheng Wang, Jiantao Jia, Junjie Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Vaccination and Therapeutics.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ying WangSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 032000, China.
Lingrui DuanSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 032000, China.
Mufan LiSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 032000, China.
Jiayu WangSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 032000, China.
Jianzhou YangSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 032000, China.
Congying SongClinical Research Academy, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Peking University, Shenzhen 518000, China.
Jing LiRenal Division, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Peking University, Shenzhen 518000, China.
Jinsheng WangDepartment of Pathology and Basic Medicine, Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi 046000, China.
Jiantao JiaDepartment of Pathophysiology and Basic Medicine, Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi 046000, China.
Junjie XuClinical Research Academy, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Peking University, Shenzhen 518000, China.
Shanxi Medical University · CNChangzhi Medical College · CNPeking University Shenzhen Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81872674the Academic technology leader project of Changzhi Medical College XSQ201902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with diabetes are more susceptible to severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2 infection, but vaccine hesitancy is a problem in this population. We investigated the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy among diabetes patients in China through a cross-sectional survey from April and August 2021 using a questionnaire administered to patients at two hospitals affiliated with Changzhi Medical College (Shanxi, China). The health belief model (HBM) is used examining factors influencing vaccine hesitancy. After adjusting for potential confounders, a multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze correlations between vaccine hesitancy and associated factors. Of the 483 participants, 56.4% (273/483) had vaccine hesitancy, including 58.2% (159/273) who were unsure of being vaccinated and 41.8% (114/273) who were unwilling. Although patients considered SARS-CoV-2 infection to be serious (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.36-6.42;

Indexed as

diabeteshealth belief modelSARS-CoV-2 vaccinevaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID35062790
PMCPMC8778010
OpenAlexW4206340501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.