Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35062681›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Factors Influencing Decision Making Regarding the Acceptance of the COVID-19 Vaccination in Egypt: A Cross-Sectional Study in an Urban, Well-Educated Sample.

Mohamed Elsayed, Radwa Abdullah El-Abasiri, Khaled T Dardeer, Manar Ahmed Kamal, Mila Nu Nu Htay, Birgit Abler, Roy Rillera Marzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Social Vulnerability and COVID-19 Vaccine in Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Vaccination against COVID-19 in Europe: A Typology Based on Cluster Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohamed ElsayedDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy III, University of Ulm, Leimgrubenweg 12-14, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
Radwa Abdullah El-AbasiriNuffield Department of Population Health, Old Road Campus, University of Oxford Richard Doll Building, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5634-9848
Khaled T DardeerFaculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo 11562, Egypt.
Manar Ahmed KamalFaculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha 13511, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-4339-1788
Mila Nu Nu HtayDepartment of Community Medicine, Manipal University College Malaysia, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Melaka 75150, Malaysia.
Birgit AblerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy III, University of Ulm, Leimgrubenweg 12-14, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
Roy Rillera MarzoDepartment of Community Medicine, International Medical School, Management and Science University, Shah Alam 40100, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-9414-4010

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has raised the necessity to rapidly develop safe and effective vaccines to limit the spread of infections. Meanwhile, vaccine hesitancy is a significant barrier to community vaccination strategies.

methodsAn internet-based cross-sectional survey was conducted from March to April 2021 during the start of the vaccination campaigns.

resultsA total of 1009 subjects participated, and the mean age (±SD) was 29.11 ± 8.2 years. Among them, 68.8% believed that vaccination is an effective method to control the spread of the disease, 81.2% indicated acceptance of the vaccine, and 87.09% reported that their doctor's recommendation was essential for decision making. After adjusting for socioeconomic characteristics, rural residency (AOR 1.783, 95%CI: 1.256-2.531), working a part-time job (AOR 2.535, 95%CI: 1.202-5.343) or a full-time job (AOR 1.951, 95%CI: 1.056-3.604), being a student (AOR 3.516, 95%CI: 1.805-6.852) and having a partner (AOR 1.457, 95%CI: 1.062-2.00) were significant predictors for higher vaccine acceptance among the study participants. Believing in the vaccine's efficacy showed the strongest correlation with vaccine acceptance (Spearman's

conclusionsAlthough general vaccine acceptance is high (32.85%) in participants in our study, gender and geographic disparities were observed in the investigated urban population of young, well-educated Egyptians.

Indexed as

acceptingCOVID-19Egyptfactorsintentionvaccine

Identifiers

PMID35062681
PMCPMC8780609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.