Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35062668›Full record

ReviewVaccines2021

Ending the Pandemic: How Behavioural Science Can Help Optimize Global COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake.

Michael Vallis, Simon Bacon, Kim Corace, Keven Joyal-Desmarais, Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin, Stefania Paduano, Justin Presseau, Joshua Rash, Abebaw Mengistu Yohannes, Kim Lavoie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Customizing workflows for electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) symptom monitoring using the action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT) framework.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Hesitant or Confident: A Qualitative Study Examining Latinos' Perceptions of COVID-19 Vaccines in Arizona.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael VallisDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3J 3T4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0165-5936
Simon BaconDepartment of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H4B 1R6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7075-0358
Kim CoraceDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1Z 7K4, Canada.
Keven Joyal-DesmaraisDepartment of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H4B 1R6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0657-8367
Sherri Sheinfeld GorinDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbour, MI 48104, USA.
Stefania PaduanoDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3640-9177
Justin PresseauClinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada.
Joshua RashDepartment of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NF A1B 3X9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0927-0712
Abebaw Mengistu YohannesDepartment of Physical Therapy, Azusa Pacific University, Azusa, CA 91720, USA.
Kim LavoieMontreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, Montreal, QC H4J 1C5, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Governments, public health officials and pharmaceutical companies have all mobilized resources to address the COVID-19 pandemic. Lockdowns, social distancing, and personal protective behaviours have been helpful but have shut down economies and disrupted normal activities. Vaccinations protect populations from COVID-19 and allow a return to pre-pandemic ways of living. However, vaccine development, distribution and promotion have not been sufficient to ensure maximum vaccine uptake. Vaccination is an individual choice and requires acceptance of the need to be vaccinated in light of any risks. This paper presents a behavioural sciences framework to promote vaccine acceptance by addressing the complex and ever evolving landscape of COVID-19. Effective promotion of vaccine uptake requires understanding the context-specific barriers to acceptance. We present the AACTT framework (Action, Actor, Context, Target, Time) to identify the action needed to be taken, the person needed to act, the context for the action, as well as the target of the action within a timeframe. Once identified a model for identifying and overcoming barriers, called COM-B (Capability, Opportunity and Motivation lead to Behaviour), is presented. This analysis identifies issues associated with capability, opportunity and motivation to act. These frameworks can be used to facilitate action that is fluid and involves policy makers, organisational leaders as well as citizens and families.

Indexed as

behavioural sciencebehaviour changeCOVID-19vaccine acceptancevaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID35062668
PMCPMC8777721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.