Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35062664›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Factors Influencing Australian Healthcare Workers' COVID-19 Vaccine Intentions across Settings: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Jessica Kaufman, Kathleen L Bagot, Monsurul Hoq, Julie Leask, Holly Seale, Ruby Biezen, Lena Sanci, Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis, J Simon Bell, Jane Munro and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jessica KaufmanVaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5139-4183
Kathleen L BagotVaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne 3052, Australia.
Monsurul HoqVaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne 3052, Australia.
Julie LeaskSusan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sydney, Sydney 2052, Australia.
Holly SealeSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia.
Ruby BiezenDepartment of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Carlton 3010, Australia.
Lena SanciDepartment of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Carlton 3010, Australia.
Jo-Anne Manski-NankervisDepartment of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Carlton 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2153-3482
J Simon BellCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne 3052, Australia.
Jane MunroVaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne 3052, Australia.
Carol JosVaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne 3052, Australia.
Darren Suryawijaya OngVaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne 3052, Australia.
Jane OliverVaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne 3052, Australia.
Jane TuckermanVaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne 3052, Australia.
Margie DanchinVaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne 3052, Australia.

Funding

Government of Victoria C9824
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare workers' COVID-19 vaccination coverage is important for staff and patient safety, workforce capacity and patient uptake. We aimed to identify COVID-19 vaccine intentions, factors associated with uptake and information needs for healthcare workers in Victoria, Australia. We administered a cross-sectional online survey to healthcare workers in hospitals, primary care and aged or disability care settings (12 February-26 March 2021). The World Health Organization Behavioural and Social Drivers of COVID-19 vaccination framework informed survey design and framing of results. Binary regression results adjusted for demographics provide risk differences between those intending and not intending to accept a COVID-19 vaccine. In total, 3074 healthcare workers completed the survey. Primary care healthcare workers reported the highest intention to accept a COVID-19 vaccine (84%, 755/898), followed by hospital-based (77%, 1396/1811) and aged care workers (67%, 243/365). A higher proportion of aged care workers were concerned about passing COVID-19 to their patients compared to those working in primary care or hospitals. Only 25% felt they had sufficient information across five vaccine topics, but those with sufficient information had higher vaccine intentions. Approximately half thought vaccines should be mandated. Despite current high vaccine rates, our results remain relevant for booster programs and future vaccination rollouts.

Indexed as

communicationcoronavirusimmunizationvaccinationvaccine acceptance

Identifiers

PMID35062664
PMCPMC8781521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.