ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Gaze Tracking Based on Concatenating Spatial-Temporal Features.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential effects of free viewing and goal-directed search on visual attention: An eye-tracking study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Gaze Estimation Approach Using Deep Differential Residual Network.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Based on experimental observations, there is a correlation between time and consecutive gaze positions in visual behaviors. Previous studies on gaze point estimation usually use images as the input for model trainings without taking into account the sequence relationship between image data. In addition to the spatial features, the temporal features are considered to improve the accuracy in this paper by using videos instead of images as the input data. To be able to capture spatial and temporal features at the same time, the convolutional neural network (CNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) network are introduced to build a training model. In this way, CNN is used to extract the spatial features, and LSTM correlates temporal features. This paper presents a CNN Concatenating LSTM network (CCLN) that concatenates spatial and temporal features to improve the performance of gaze estimation in the case of time-series videos as the input training data. In addition, the proposed model can be optimized by exploring the numbers of LSTM layers, the influence of batch normalization (BN) and global average pooling layer (GAP) on CCLN. It is generally believed that larger amounts of training data will lead to better models. To provide data for training and prediction, we propose a method for constructing datasets of video for gaze point estimation. The issues are studied, including the effectiveness of different commonly used general models and the impact of transfer learning. Through exhaustive evaluation, it has been proved that the proposed method achieves a better prediction accuracy than the existing CNN-based methods. Finally, 93.1% of the best model and 92.6% of the general model MobileNet are obtained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.