Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35062426›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Dynamic Scheduling of Contextually Categorised Internet of Things Services in Fog Computing Environment.

Petar Krivic, Mario Kusek, Igor Cavrak, Pavle Skocir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Petar KrivicFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Mario KusekFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Igor CavrakFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Pavle SkocirFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-3804-1070

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fog computing emerged as a concept that responds to the requirements of upcoming solutions requiring optimizations primarily in the context of the following QoS parameters: latency, throughput, reliability, security, and network traffic reduction. The rapid development of local computing devices and container-based virtualization enabled the application of fog computing within the IoT environment. However, it is necessary to utilize algorithm-based service scheduling that considers the targeted QoS parameters to optimize the service performance and reach the potential of the fog computing concept. In this paper, we first describe our categorization of IoT services that affects the execution of our scheduling algorithm. Secondly, we propose our scheduling algorithm that considers the context of processing devices, user context, and service context to determine the optimal schedule for the execution of service components across the distributed fog-to-cloud environment. The conducted simulations confirmed the performance of the proposed algorithm and showcased its major contribution-dynamic scheduling, i.e., the responsiveness to the volatile QoS parameters due to changeable network conditions. Thus, we successfully demonstrated that our dynamic scheduling algorithm enhances the efficiency of service performance based on the targeted QoS criteria of the specific service scenario.

Indexed as

Internet of ThingsAlgorithmsCloud ComputingReproducibility of Resultscontext-aware systemsfog computingInternet of Things (IoT)QoSservice categorizationservice orchestrationservice schedulingsmart environments

Identifiers

PMID35062426
PMCPMC8777912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.