Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35061922›Full record

ReviewArtificial organs2022

Narrative review of the systemic inflammatory reaction to cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass.

Enrico Squiccimarro, Alessandra Stasi, Roberto Lorusso, Domenico Paparella

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Artificial organs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06539234 (Angiotensin II Stress Test. Renin Kinetics During Treatment of Vasoplegic Shock With Angiotensin II in Relation to Hemodynamic Response to Treatment With Angiotensin II.), which is not on this map. Cited by 85 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06539234 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Angiotensin II Stress Test. Renin Kinetics During Treatment of Vasoplegic Shock With Angiotensin II in Relation to Hemodynamic Response to Treatment With Angiotensin II.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Medical Centre MariborRan2024 to 2026Enrolled80ConditionsShock, Vasoplegic Syndrome
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. National Heart Center Perfusion Guidelines.Saudi medical journal · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Does Cardiopulmonary Bypass Influence Outcomes in Stage 2 Palliation?Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Enrico SquiccimarroDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6887-747X
Alessandra StasiDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Roberto LorussoCardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart & Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Domenico PaparellaDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2261-7098
University of Foggia · ITMaastricht School of Management · NLUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData from large cardiac surgery registries have been depicting a downward trend of mortality and morbidities in the last 20 years. However, despite decades of medical evolution, cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass still provoke a systemic inflammatory response, which occasionally leads to worsened outcome. This article seeks to outline the mechanism of the phenomenon.

methodsA thorough review of the literature has been performed. Criteria for considering studies for this non-systematic review were as follows: observational and interventional studies investigating the systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery, experimental studies describing relevant molecular mechanisms, and essential review studies pertinent to the topic.

resultsThe intrinsic variability of the inflammatory response to cardiac surgery, together with its heterogenous perception among clinicians, as well as the arduousness to early discriminate high-responder patients from those who will not develop a clinically relevant reaction, concurred to hitherto unconclusive randomized controlled trials. Furthermore, peremptory knowledge about the pathophysiology of maladaptive inflammation following heart surgery is still lacking.

conclusionsSystemic inflammation following cardiac surgery is a frequent entity that occasionally becomes clinically relevant. Specific genomic differences, age, and other preoperative factors influence the magnitude of the response, which elements display extreme redundancy and pleiotropism that the target of a single pathway cannot represent a silver bullet.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresCardiopulmonary BypassHumansInflammationcardiac surgerycardiopulmonary bypassgenomicsinflammatory reactiontranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID35061922
PMCPMC9303696
OpenAlexW4205593346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.