Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35061832›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Individual pupil size changes as a robust indicator of cognitive familiarity differences.

Léon Franzen, Amanda Cabugao, Bianca Grohmann, Karine Elalouf, Aaron P Johnson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Léon FranzenDepartment of Psychology, Concordia University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2277-5408
Amanda CabugaoDepartment of Psychology, Concordia University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Bianca GrohmannDepartment of Marketing, John Molson School of Business, Concordia University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Karine ElaloufDepartment of Psychology, Concordia University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Aaron P JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, Concordia University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Concordia University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive psychology has a long history of using physiological measures, such as pupillometry. However, their susceptibility to confounds introduced by stimulus properties, such as color and luminance, has limited their application. Pupil size measurements, in particular, require sophisticated experimental designs to dissociate relatively small changes in pupil diameter due to cognitive responses from larger ones elicited by changes in stimulus properties or the experimental environment. Here, building on previous research, we present a pupillometry paradigm that adapts the pupil to stimulus properties during the baseline period without revealing stimulus meaning or context by using a pixel-scrambled image mask around an intact image. We demonstrate its robustness in the context of pupillary responses to branded product familiarity. Results show larger average and peak pupil dilation for passively viewed familiar product images and an extended later temporal component representing differences in familiarity across participants (starting around 1400 ms post-stimulus onset). These amplitude differences are present for almost all participants at the single-participant level, and vary somewhat by product category. However, amplitude differences were absent during the baseline period. These findings demonstrate that involuntary pupil size measurements combined with the presented paradigm are successful in dissociating cognitive effects of familiarity from physical stimulus confounds.

Indexed as

Recognition, PsychologyAdolescentAdultCognitionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationPupilReflex, PupillaryYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35061832
PMCPMC8782349
OpenAlexW4206002463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.