Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35061813›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Disparate participation by gender of conference attendants in scientific discussions.

Melika Rezaee, Audrey Verde, Benedict Anchang, Sarah A Mattonen, Jordi Garcia-Diaz, Heike Daldrup-Link

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. [Representation of women in senior positions in emergency medicine].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melika RezaeeDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
Audrey VerdeDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
Benedict AnchangDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
Sarah A MattonenDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
Jordi Garcia-DiazDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9325-8403
Heike Daldrup-LinkDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4929-819X

Funding

Single-cell Analysis of Normal and Perturbed Dynamic Biological SystemsZIAES103350 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ANCHANG, BENEDICT · 2020 to 2025
$3.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One important metric of a radiologist's visibility and influence is their ability to participate in discussion within their community. The goal of our study was to compare the participation level of men and women in scientific discussions at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA). Eleven volunteers collected participation data by gender in 59 sessions (286 presentations) at the 2018 RSNA meeting. Data was analyzed using a combination of Chi-squared, paired Wilcoxon signed-rank and T-test. Of all RSNA professional attendees at the RSNA, 68% were men and 32% were women. Of the 2869 presentations listed in the program, 65% were presented by men and 35% were presented by women. Of the 286 presentations in our sample, 177 (61.8%) were presented by men and 109 (38.1%) were presented by women. Of these 286 presentations, 81 (63%) were moderated by men and 47 (37%) were moderated by women. From the audience, 190 male attendees participated in 134 question-and-answer (Q&A) sessions following presentations and 58 female attendees participated in 52 Q&A sessions (P<0.001). Female attendees who did participate in Q&A sessions talked for a significantly shorter period of time (mean 7.14 ± 17.7 seconds, median 0) compared to male attendees (28.7 ± 29.6 seconds, median 16; P<0.001). Overall, our findings demonstrate that women participated less than men in the Q&A sessions at RSNA 2018, and talked for a shorter period of time. The fact that women were outnumbered among their male peers may explain the difference in behavior by gender.

Indexed as

Career MobilityCongresses as TopicFemaleHumansMaleRadiologistsRadiologySex FactorsSexism

Identifiers

PMID35061813
PMCPMC8782342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.