Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35061811›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and associated factors according to sex: A population-based survey in Salvador, Brazil.

Nivison Nery, Juan P Aguilar Ticona, Cristiane W Cardoso, Ana Paula Pitanga Barbuda Prates, Helena Cristina Alves Vieira, Andrea Salvador de Almeida, Mirela Maisa da Silva Souza, Olivete Borba Dos Reis, Maysa Pellizzaro, Moyra Machado Portilho and 16 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Profiling vaccine hesitancy in nursing to tailor public healthcare policies: A cross-sectional international study.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Article
  12. Between intention and action: the paradoxes of female vaccination.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nivison NeryInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Juan P Aguilar TiconaInstituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6971-2677
Cristiane W CardosoInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Ana Paula Pitanga Barbuda PratesSecretaria Municipal de Saúde de Salvador, Salvador, Brazil.
Helena Cristina Alves VieiraSecretaria Municipal de Saúde de Salvador, Salvador, Brazil.
Andrea Salvador de AlmeidaSecretaria Municipal de Saúde de Salvador, Salvador, Brazil.
Mirela Maisa da Silva SouzaSecretaria Municipal de Saúde de Salvador, Salvador, Brazil.
Olivete Borba Dos ReisSecretaria Municipal de Saúde de Salvador, Salvador, Brazil.
Maysa PellizzaroInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Moyra Machado PortilhoInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Renan Rosa da AnunciaçãoInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Renato VictorianoInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Rosangela Oliveira Dos AnjosInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Hernán Dario ArgibayInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Douglas Oliveira Carmo LimaInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Isadora Lima MesquitaInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Wesley Mota ConceiçãoInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Perla Machado SantanaInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Elaine Carvalho OliveiraInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Pamela Santos Nascimento SantanaInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4709-3801
Claudia Ida BrodskynInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Deborah Bittencourt Mothé FragaInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Manuela da Silva SolcàInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Mitermayer Galvão ReisInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Federico CostaInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Guilherme S RibeiroInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6798-2059
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BRSecretaria Municipal de Saúde · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination is a major strategy to prevent the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, information about factors associated with men and women intention to be vaccinated are scarce. To determine COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and identify factors associated vaccine hesitancy according to sex, we performed a cross-sectional population-based random survey in Salvador, Brazil between Nov/2020-Jan/2021. Participants were interviewed to obtain data on intention to receive and pay for a COVID-19 vaccine, as well as on demographics, comorbidities, influenza vaccination history, previous diagnosis of COVID-19, and exposures and perception of COVID-19 risk. Among 2,521 participants, 2,053 (81.4%) reported willingness to use a COVID-19 vaccine and 468 (18.6%) hesitated to take it. Among those intending to get vaccinated, 1,400 (68.2%) would pay for the vaccine if necessary. Sex-stratified multivariable analysis found that men who were working and who had comorbidities were less likely to hesitate about using the vaccine. Among women, higher educational level and high perception of COVID-19 risk were associated with less vaccine hesitancy. In both groups, reporting influenza vaccination in 2020 reduced the chance of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. COVID-19 vaccine campaigns targeting to reduce vaccine hesitancy are urgently needed. These campaigns should consider gender differences in order to be successful.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrazilCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntentionMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisSARS-CoV-2Sex FactorsVaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35061811
PMCPMC8782400
OpenAlexW4206200394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.