Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35061804›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2022

Prospective observational study investigating the effectiveness, safety, women's experiences and quality of life at 3 months regarding cervical ripening methods for induction of labor at term-The MATUCOL study protocol.

Guillaume Ducarme, Stephanie Martin, Veronique Chesnoy, Lucie Planche, Marie-Pierre Berte, Elodie Netier-Herault

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guillaume DucarmeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Departemental, 85000, La Roche sur Yon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2549-353X
Stephanie MartinClinical Research Center, Centre Hospitalier Departemental, 85000, La Roche sur Yon, France.
Veronique ChesnoyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Departemental, 85000, La Roche sur Yon, France.
Lucie PlancheClinical Research Center, Centre Hospitalier Departemental, 85000, La Roche sur Yon, France.
Marie-Pierre BerteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Departemental, 85000, La Roche sur Yon, France.
Elodie Netier-HeraultDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Departemental, 85000, La Roche sur Yon, France.
Roche (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purposes of successful induction of labor (IOL) are to shorten the time for IOL to delivery, increase the vaginal delivery rate, and reduce the rate of maternal and neonatal morbidity. In cases of unfavorable cervix (Bishop score <6), cervical ripening is advised to improve vaginal delivery rate. It may be initiated by mechanical (double balloon catheter (DBC), synthetic osmotic dilator) or pharmacologic (prostaglandins) methods, and the problem is complex due to the multitude of cervical ripening methods. We are constantly looking for the optimal protocol of cervical ripening for each woman. The present study aims to elucidate whether cervical ripening method is associated with increase rate of vaginal delivery, good women's experience and unaltered long-term quality of life after cervical ripening at term regarding maternal and obstetric characteristics. METHODS AND

designThe MATUCOL study is a monocentric, prospective, observational study of all consecutive women who required cervical ripening (Bishop score <6) using different methods (DBC, vaginal dinoprostone, oral misoprostol) with a live fetus at term (≥37 weeks) between January 2020 and August 2021. The outcomes will be mode of delivery, maternal and neonatal morbidity, discomfort/pain assessments during cervical ripening, women's experience and satisfaction, and the impact of cervical ripening on the health-related quality of life at 3 months. If it reports a significant efficacy/safety/perinatal morbidity/women's satisfaction/quality of life at 3 months post-delivery associated with a method of cervical ripening in a specific situation (gestational and/or fetal disease) using a multivariate analysis, its use should be reconsidered in clinical practice. DISCUSSION: This study will reveal that some cervical ripening methods will be more effectiveness, safe, with good women's experiences and QOL at 3 months compared to others regarding maternal and obstetric characteristics.

trial registrationThis study is being performed at La Roche sur Yon Hospital following registration as GNEDS on January 8, 2020.

Indexed as

AdultCervical RipeningCervix UteriDelivery, ObstetricDinoprostoneFemaleHumansLabor, InducedMisoprostolPregnancyProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeDinoprostoneMisoprostol

Identifiers

PMID35061804
PMCPMC8782477
OpenAlexW4206462783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.