Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35061790›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Machine learning classification of trajectories from molecular dynamics simulations of chromosome segregation.

David Geisel, Peter Lenz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David GeiselDepartment of Physics, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0719-8967
Peter LenzDepartment of Physics, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contrast to the well characterized mitotic machinery in eukaryotes it seems as if there is no universal mechanism organizing chromosome segregation in all bacteria. Apparently, some bacteria even use combinations of different segregation mechanisms such as protein machines or rely on physical forces. The identification of the relevant mechanisms is a difficult task. Here, we introduce a new machine learning approach to this problem. It is based on the analysis of trajectories of individual loci in the course of chromosomal segregation obtained by fluorescence microscopy. While machine learning approaches have already been applied successfully to trajectory classification in other areas, so far it has not been possible to use them to discriminate segregation mechanisms in bacteria. A main obstacle for this is the large number of trajectories required to train machine learning algorithms that we overcome here by using trajectories obtained from molecular dynamics simulations. We used these trajectories to train four different machine learning algorithms, two linear models and two tree-based classifiers, to discriminate segregation mechanisms and possible combinations of them. The classification was performed once using the complete trajectories as high-dimensional input vectors as well as on a set of features which were used to transform the trajectories into low-dimensional input vectors for the classifiers. Finally, we tested our classifiers on shorter trajectories with duration times comparable (or even shorter) than typical experimental trajectories and on trajectories measured with varying temporal resolutions. Our results demonstrate that machine learning algorithms are indeed capable of discriminating different segregation mechanisms in bacteria and to even resolve combinations of the mechanisms on rather short time scales.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMolecular Dynamics SimulationBacteriaChromosome SegregationDNA ReplicationMicroscopy, Fluorescence

Identifiers

PMID35061790
PMCPMC8782305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.