ArticlePloS one2022
Validation of the Perception Neuron system for full-body motion capture.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Concurrent validity of wearable IMUs for sagittal plane lower-limb range of motion during walking and estimated ground reaction forces: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Conversion of Upper-Limb Inertial Measurement Unit Data to Joint Angles: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Pooled it
- The case study of prosthetic foot alignment on amputee gait kinematics using IMU-based motion capture system.International biomechanics · 2026Article
- Concurrent Validation of a Multi-Camera Markerless Motion Capture System Against Inertial Sensors for Upper- and Lower-Limb Joint Kinematics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Unlocking Creative Movement with Inertial Technology.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- The Reliability and Validity of an Instrumented Device for Tracking the Shoulder Range of Motion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Validity of Wearable Inertial Sensors for Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Concurrent validity and test reliability of the deep learning markerless motion capture system during the overhead squat.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- MultiSenseBadminton: Wearable Sensor-Based Biomechanical Dataset for Evaluation of Badminton Performance.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Article
- Concurrent validity of inertial measurement units in range of motion measurements of upper extremity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Wearable technologies · 2024Review
- Article
- Effects of IMU sensor-to-segment calibration on clinical 3D elbow joint angles estimation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Examination of the Accuracy of Movement Tracking Systems for Monitoring Exercise for Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Comprehensive Analysis of the Validity and Reliability of the Perception Neuron Studio for Upper-Body Motion Capture.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Capturing Upper Body Kinematics and Localization with Low-Cost Sensors for Rehabilitation Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advancements in Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) offers the possibility of its use as a cost effective and portable alternative to traditional optoelectronic motion capture systems in analyzing biomechanical performance. One such commercially available IMU is the Perception Neuron motion capture system (PNS). The accuracy of the PNS had been tested and was reported to be a valid method for assessing the upper body range of motion to within 5° RMSE. However, testing of the PNS was limited to upper body motion involving functional movement within a single plane. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to further validate the Perception Neuron system with reference to a conventional optoelectronic motion capture system (VICON) through the use of dynamic movements (e.g., walking, jogging and a multi-articular sports movement with object manipulation) and to determine its feasibility through full-body kinematic analysis. Validation was evaluated using Pearson's R correlation, RMSE and Bland-Altman estimates. Present findings suggest that the PNS performed well against the VICON motion analysis system with most joint angles reporting a RMSE of < 4° and strong average Pearson's R correlation of 0.85, with the exception of the shoulder abduction/adduction where RMSE was larger and Pearson's R correlation at a moderate level. Bland-Altman analysis revealed that most joint angles across the different movements had a mean bias of less than 10°, except for the shoulder abduction/adduction and elbow flexion/extension measurements. It was concluded that the PNS may not be the best substitute for traditional motion analysis technology if there is a need to replicate raw joint angles. However, there was adequate sensitivity to measure changes in joint angles and would be suitable when normalized joint angles are compared and the focus of analysis is to identify changes in movement patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.