Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35061675›Full record

ArticlePloS one

Effects of a blend of chestnut and quebracho tannins on gut health and performance of broiler chickens.

Enzo A Redondo, Leandro M Redondo, Octavio A Bruzzone, Juan M Diaz-Carrasco, Claudio Cabral, Victorino M Garces, Maximo M Liñeiro, Mariano E Fernandez-Miyakawa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Intestinal Effects of Brewers' Spent Grain Extract In Ovo (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Regulatory Effects of the ProbioticThe journal of poultry science · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Enzo A RedondoInstituto de Patobiología Veterinaria, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Leandro M RedondoInstituto de Patobiología Veterinaria, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Octavio A BruzzoneConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Juan M Diaz-CarrascoInstituto de Patobiología Veterinaria, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Claudio CabralSilvateam S.A., Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Victorino M GarcesGranja Tres Arroyos S.A., Capilla del Señor, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Maximo M LiñeiroGranja Tres Arroyos S.A., Capilla del Señor, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mariano E Fernandez-MiyakawaInstituto de Patobiología Veterinaria, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
National Agricultural Technology Institute · ARConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARNational Food Safety and Quality Service · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial restrictions prompted the search for cost and biologically effective alternatives to replace antimicrobial growth promoters (AGPs) in food-producing animals. In addition, the efficacy of this alternatives needs to be contrasted in field/commercial trials under different challenge conditions. However only a few studies describing the impact of tannins or others AGP-alternatives in commercial poultry production conditions are actually available. The aim of the present work is to study how the inclusion of a blend of chestnut and quebracho tannins can affect broiler productive performance and health under commercial conditions. Three experiments with different approaches were conducted: (1) a trial comparing the effects of both additives (tannins vs AGP) on different commercial farms at the same time; (2) the follow-up of one farm during an entire productive year; and (3) an experimental trial using a C. perfringens challenge model in broiler chickens. Although productive results from field trials were similar among treatments, evaluations of gut health indicators showed improvements in the tannins treated flocks. Frequency and severity of intestinal gross lesions were reduced in jejunum (42% vs 23%; p<0.05-1.37 vs. 0.73; p<0.01, respectively) and ileum (25% vs. 10%; p<0.0.5-1.05 vs. 0.58; p<0.01) in tannins treated birds. Results from 16S studies, show that cecal microbiota diversity was not differentially affected by AGPs or tannins, but changes in the relative abundance of certain taxa were described, including Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium groups. Results from experimental C. perfringens necrotic enteritis showed that tannins treated birds had reduced incidence of gross lesions in jejunum (43.75 vs. 74.19%; p<0.01) and ileum (18.75% vs. 45.16%; p<0.05) compared with control. These results suggest that AGPs can be replaced by tannins feed additives, and contribute in the implementation of antimicrobial-free programs in broilers without affecting health or performance.

Indexed as

Animal FeedChickensTanninsAnimalsClostridium perfringensFagaceaeGastrointestinal MicrobiomePoultry DiseasesTannins

Identifiers

PMID35061675
PMCPMC8782372
OpenAlexW3202151865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.